1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Studentka2010 [4]
3 years ago
8

Hitler takes over Czechoslovakia, Poland, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and Denmark with the hopes of conquering France and Great Bri

tain. What do France and Great Britain do in response to this growing threat?
History
1 answer:
Feliz [49]3 years ago
6 0
They declare war on Germany. France gets occupied within weeks of their armed conflicts beginning, and Britain is put on the defensive against Germany for over a year. Both France and Britain return to the offensive when Russia and the US begin to participate with the allies.
You might be interested in
A statement that’s accuracy can be tested by experiments and through observations is formally called a _______________?
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

Hypothesis is the answer

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the effect of the Supreme Court’s ruling in United v.Federal Election Commission
Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer: The Court upheld the reporting and disclaimer requirements for independent expenditures and electioneering communications. The Court's ruling did not affect the ban on corporate contributions.

Explanation:no cap

5 0
3 years ago
How did the government failed its citizens during the holocaust ?
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer: International response to the Holocaust

In the decades since the Holocaust, some national governments, international bodies and world leaders have been criticized for their failure to take appropriate action to save the millions of European Jews, Roma, and other victims of the Holocaust. Critics say that such intervention, particularly by the Allied governments, might have saved substantial numbers of people and could have been accomplished without the diversion of significant resources from the war effort.[1]

Other researchers have challenged such criticism. Some have argued that the idea that the Allies took no action is a myth—that the Allies accepted as many German Jewish immigrants as the Nazis would allow—and that theoretical military action by the Allies, such as bombing the Auschwitz concentration camp, would have saved the lives of very few people.[2] Others have said that the limited intelligence available to the Allies—who, as late as October 1944, did not know the locations of many of the Nazi death camps or the purposes of the various buildings within those camps they had identified—made precision bombing impossible.[3]

In three cases, entire countries resisted the deportation of their Jewish population during the Holocaust. In other countries, notable individuals or communities created resistance during the Holocaust.

Explanation: American Restrictions on Immigration

America’s traditional policy of open immigration had ended when Congress enacted restrictive immigration quotas in 1921 and 1924. The quota system allowed only 25,957 Germans to enter the country every year. After the stock market crash of 1929, rising unemployment caused restrictionist sentiment to grow, and President Herbert Hoover ordered vigorous enforcement of visa regulations. The new policy significantly reduced immigration; in 1932 the United States issued only 35,576 immigration visas.

State Department officials continued their restrictive measures after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s inauguration in March 1933. Although some Americans sincerely believed that the country lacked the resources to accommodate newcomers, the nativism of many others reflected the growing problem of anti-Semitism.

Of course, American anti-Semitism never approached the intensity of Jew-hatred in Nazi Germany, but pollsters found that many Americans looked upon Jews unfavorably. A much more threatening sign was the presence of anti-Semitic leaders and movements on the fringes of American politics, including Father Charles E. Coughlin, the charismatic radio priest, and William Dudley Pelley’s Silver Shirts.

6 0
2 years ago
I am a word to describe a weak or loose organization of states. The smaller states make their own laws and decisions and the cen
Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

Articles of confederation

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Anybody good in history? And know how to do this? Free Brainliest and points!
anygoal [31]

1. Europe

2. He like being in the war because it provides beifents

Highlight "The GI Bill was a blessing"

3. WW2 affected lots of peoples view on what they do and dont have.

Highlight "The war changed our whole idea of how we wanted to live when we came back. We set our sights pretty high"

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 2. What is a legacy?
    9·1 answer
  • The middle class that emerged during the industrial revolution consisted mainly of
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following did troops face in the Pacific Theater that they did not face in the European Theater? ground combat extr
    6·1 answer
  • What is the name of the speaker of the house of representatives now in 2017?
    6·1 answer
  • Why was the first smartphone considered a disruptive technology?
    7·2 answers
  • What effect did the poor harvest have on the ordinary people of France?
    11·1 answer
  • Which best describes a significant difference between north and south in years leading up to the civil war
    14·1 answer
  • True or False: For cities and complex civilizations to develop they needed a surplus of food (made possible through developments
    6·2 answers
  • Why was Great Britain justified in imperializing India?
    14·1 answer
  • 11. In the 1970s Music" page, which popular music genre of the 1970s would
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!