Well I can't see the possible sentences, but muslims were a minority in India at the time and the population was predominantly Hindu. Forcing the majority of the population to change their religion forcibly (and through that many of their core values, beliefs, traditions and practices) was a quick way to create political unrest which could lead to a revolution. They we're already a minority ruling a large and powerful nation, so they were already dealing with a lot of resistance from the population as it was. Maybe they wanted to practice tolerance for moral reasons, but more likely they just didn't want to push their luck when they were already struggling to remain popular.
knights or if in France musketeers sorry its seven days late STAY SAFE and have a good day =D
Answer:
To be honest I think is B
Explanation:
B)
Because, if you read closely and carefully it says "all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free."
HOPE THIS HELPS ;3
--Koda
The answers would be B and C...
Since you are in Connexus (TCAH) its in your textbook
Topic 2 The Ancient Middle East and Egypt (3200 B.C.–500 B.C.) > 2.2 Empires in Mesopotamia page 33
The answer is going to be the giant Panda bear