The principle of stare decisis be a bad idea because if a major court decision undermines rights and liberties, then it might stand longer.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Stare decisis is a common principle followed in the legal system to determine points in lawsuit according to precedent.
According to stare decisis, the court follows the previous case judgment and follows it in a same way while handling similar cases. This shows that cases with similar facts or scenario are approached in the same way.
Courts decide to follow stare decisis as the solutions are already provided for the issues. The courts in America generally follow stare decisis principle to make decision.
Native Americans lived here way before anyone else
The correct answer is; The buyer.
Further Explanation:
It is the buyer who is legally responsible for knowing the condition of the title to the property. The buyer has the right to go to a title company and have the title checked. There are thousands of title companies in the United States.
A title company will go back through the title and all the owners and make sure that the title is free and clear of liens. This needs to be done before signing the final paperwork on the property. This is all public record and the buyer can even do this themselves. The cost of the title company will vary depending on location. The buyer is responsible for paying the title company and any fees incurred.
Learn more about property titles at brainly.com/question/3537707
#LearnwithBrainly
Hmm.... that seems like it would be <em>true</em>... :)
Civics is the study of rights and duties of citizenship, therefore you can relate the earthquake and tsunami deaths because emergency services would fall under the practice of civic. All emergency services go to natural disasters when they happen. Hope this helps.
