This drawing by Jacques-Louis David from the french revolution depicts at least one key moment showing the Tennis court oath.
One of the key moments in the French Revolution, the Tennis Court Oath at Versailles, is depicted in Jacques-Louis David's unfinished painting titled The Tennis Court Oath, which was created between 1790 and 1794. It was David's way of honoring the crucial Tennis Court Oath, in which the Third Estate, or the common people of France's Ancien Régime, stood defiantly against the First and Second Estates, the clergy and nobility, in the midst of the French Revolution.
They swore to remain united until a new French constitution had been adopted by taking the famous Tennis Court Oath here in these humble surroundings.
Learn to know more about the French revolution on
brainly.com/question/26322635
#SPJ4
Hi there!
He was Robert Edward Lee.
It was an incredible battle! Lee, with his army weakened and morally dejected, withdrew with his troops without being disturbed by the also exhausted federal forces. The Battle of Gettysburg was an American Civil War battle, fought between July 1 and 3, 1863 around the town of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, as part of the Gettysburg campaign. It was the battle with the most casualties in the United States.
Answer:
Distrust between the two countries grew.
Explanation:
Soviet-US relations were based on a complicated interplay of cultural, political, and economic factors that led to bitter superpower rivalry. The Soviet's reluctance to the Americans was because the U.S refused to recognize the USSR as a legitimate recognition at the international stage, as well as their late participation in the war that culminated in the deaths of millions of Russians. Americans had been suspicious of the communist ideology of the Soviet Union and worried about the impact of tyrannical rule in Soviet Russia over their own nation.
Answer:Emperador romano es el término utilizado por los historiadores para referirse a los gobernantes del Imperio romano tras el final de la República romana.
En la Antigua Roma no existía el título de «emperador romano», sino que este título era más bien una abreviatura práctica para una complicada reunión de cargos y poderes. A pesar de la popularidad actual del título, el primero en ostentarlo realmente fue Miguel I Rangabé a principios del siglo IX, cuando se hizo llamar Basileus Rhomaion (‘emperador de los romanos’). Hay que tener en cuenta que en aquella época el significado de Basileus había cambiado de ‘soberano’ a ‘emperador’. Tampoco existía ningún título o rango análogo al título de emperador, sino que todos los títulos asociados tradicionalmente al emperador tenían su origen en la época republicana.
La discusión sobre los emperadores romanos está influenciada en gran medida por el punto de vista editorial de los historiadores. Los mismos romanos no compartían los modernos conceptos monárquicos de «imperio» y «emperador». Durante su existencia, el Imperio romano conservó todas las instituciones políticas y las tradiciones de la República romana, incluyendo el Senado y las asambleas.
En general, no se puede describir a los emperadores como gobernantes de iure. Oficialmente, el cargo de emperador era considerado como el «primero entre iguales» (primus inter pares), y muchos de ellos no llegaron a ser gobernantes de facto, sino que frecuentemente fueron simples testaferros de poderosos burócratas, funcionarios, mujeres y generales.
Explanation:
There were many reasons why the Harlem Renaissance held such significance in US history despite its fading influence during the Great Depression, but the main reasons is because it introduced whites to black culture.
