The area became<span> a </span>part of Mexico<span> in 1821 following its successful war for independence, but was ceded to the </span>United States<span> in 1848 after the </span>Mexican–American<span> War. The western </span>portion<span> of Alta </span>California<span> then was organized and admitted as the 31st </span>state<span> on September 9, 1850.</span>
There are 27 formal amendments. Hope this helps.
Cyrus' conquest was relatively humane compared to empires preceding his, such as the Babylonians and Assyrians. He allowed many areas of his empire a great deal of autonomy, rather than centrally controlling things. This distributed leadership allowed Persia to cover a greater geographical area than previous empires in that era and still be fairly stable, since most of its subjects were content to remain under Persian rule. Persian law was more codified and less arbitrary than previous empires; the king's seal declared approval of law which could only be reversed by further approved decrees -- not quite rule of law but going in that direction.
<em>Weather! :)</em>
<em></em>
<em>Hope that helps! :)</em>
<em></em>
<em>-Aphrodite</em>
Answer:
According to the article "Excerpt from civil Disobedience" we can say that it is fair that we do not get involved in problems and disadvantages that are happening in the world, but for that we need to stop exploring each other, so that those who are stuck in these problems can fight your own fight.
Explanation:
"Civil Disobedience" is the most famous work by Henry David Thoreau, where he opposes the practice of paying taxes to governments. In "Excerpt from civil Disobedience" we can see that Thoreau says that no man has a responsibility to solve the problems that exist in the world. This reinforces the idea that nobody has a duty to pay taxes, because the government does not have this responsibility and if it does not fulfill it.
However, Thoreau says that these problems exist and that no one can be prevented from solving them. However, it is necessary that people who are involved in the problem are not exploited or prevented from fighting to solve these problems. We can see elements that serve as a basis for this argument, in our personal life, since we could overcome many of our problems if the State gave us full freedom to do so, instead of being obliged to finance problems of which we are not part.
