Answer:
Dealers ; Brokers
Explanation:
Foreign exchange dealers make money or profit by buying stock at lower price and selling the same at a higher price. They do this by adding a markup on the price of stock bought by them and sell the same to a buyer. The markup serves as profit to dealers.
Foreign exchange brokers act as intermediary between buyers and sellers as traders could execute trades through a brokers only. A broker earns profit in the form of commissions and fees earned on executing each transaction.
Answer:
a. 9.98%
Explanation:
The computation of required rate of return is shown below:-
Required return= Risk - Free rate + Beta × (Market rate- Risk-free rate)
11.75% = 2.30% + 1.23 × (Market rate - 2.3%)
(11.75% - 2.30%) ÷ 1.23 = Market rate - 2.3%
Market rate = (11.75% - 2.30%) ÷ 1.23 + 2.3%
=9.98%
Therefore for computing the required rate of return on the market we simply applied the above formula.
Answer: The Contract is valid.
Explanation:
Under the UCC’s Statute of Frauds, transactions above $500 for goods cannot be made orally alone and have to be written in writing as well. This is the law that Rosenfield relied on.
However, Fallsview can argue that the Passover Retreat is not a Good, but rather a Service in which case it does not fall under the Statute.
The main bone of contention thereby becomes, if indeed it is a service or a good.
If it is a Hybrid of both, then the Court needs to decide if the services outweigh the goods involved.
From the text we see that the following were included in the package, food, entertainment, and lectures on religious subjects.
Food is the only good there and is outweighed by Entertainment and lectures on religious subjects.
As such, the contract is valid as it is for more service than good.
Answer:
Results are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Selling price= $244
Unitary variable cost= 195 - 8= $187
Fixed costs= 327,600 + 37,000= $364,600
<u>We need to determine the new pre-tax income:</u>
Sales= 244*10,000= 2,440,000
Total variable cost= 187*10,000= (1,870,000)
Total contribution margin= 570,000
Fixed costs= (364,600)
Pre-tax income= 205,400
Answer: AGREE
Explanation:
A Monopoly faces no competition and are the only sellers of the product they sell. If firms in an industry successfully engage in collusion, the resultant effect will definitely be not unlike a Monopoly because they will set prices as a single firm, control output as a single firm and essentially run the market as a single firm.
They will sell at a rate where the Marginal Revenue curve will be below the demand curve. This will mean a higher price than a competitive market which was probably the main incentive for collusion.
A recent example would be the collusion between BMW, Daimler and Volkswagen, to hinder technological progress in improving the quality of vehicle emissions in order to reduce the cost of production and maximize profits. Thankfully this was busted by the European Commission in 2019.
