Answer:
D. Consumer sovereignty
Explanation:
In a market economy, consumers determine what products are being sold and for how much. If consumers buy a lot of toy robots, the price of toy robots will go down. If consumers don't buy many toy robots, the price will go up. Consumer sovereignty is most connected with market economy.
This is because The Second Congo War - also known as the African World War, the Great African War or the Coltan War - was the armed conflict that took place in much of the territory of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (former Zaire) , after the First Congo War. This conflict began in 1998 and formally ended in 2003, when a transitional government assumed power under the terms of the Pretoria Agreement. The combatants came from nine nations (in addition to twenty different armed factions within the country), which makes it the largest African continental conflict known.
It caused the death of approximately 3.8 million people, most of them from hunger and preventable and curable diseases. Within these grave facts, this episode is considered the most critical within the so-called "Congolese genocide". This tragic number turned this war into the deadliest conflict since the Second World War, and that's not counting the millions of displaced people and refugees in neighboring countries.
Despite the formal peace reached in July 2003 in Pretoria and the agreement of the interveners to establish a government of national unity, state institutions remain weak and scarce in large sectors of the country, which still suffer sporadic outbreaks of violence. In 2004 it was estimated that about one hundred people died daily as a result of occasional skirmishes and lack of services and food. The forced migration of inhabitants continues to bleed the region in a crisis that seems not to end, while the elusive peace has not yet reached all regions.
Hey there! I'm happy to help!
Let's review the four answer options we have about the term used by Churchill in reference to the Soviet Union's rule over the Eastern European nations.
A. The Marshall Plan
B. The Iron Curtain
C. The Warsaw Pact
D. Nato
Answer A is incorrect. The Marshall Plan was a plan from the U.S. to help Europe recover from WWII.
Answer B is correct. The Iron Curtain was an unofficial boundary between the Communist Eastern and Non-Communist Western European countries. It was not an official term so it makes sense that it would be something touted by Churchill.
Answer C is incorrect because the Warsaw Pact was an alliance between Eastern European countries, and the name of the pact wouldn't be a specific term Churchill uses because everyone would due to it being official.
Answer D is wrong because NATO is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which is an alliance between North American and European countries.
Therefore, the answer is B. Iron Curtain.
Have a wonderful day! :D
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
History of citizenship describes the changing relation between an individual and the state, commonly known as citizenship. Citizenship is generally identified not as an aspect of Eastern civilization but of Western civilization.[1] There is a general view that citizenship in ancient times was a simpler relation than modern forms of citizenship, although this view has been challenged.[2]
While there is disagreement about when the relation of citizenship began, many thinkers point to the early city-states of ancient Greece, possibly as a reaction to the fear of slavery, although others see it as primarily a modern phenomenon dating back only a few hundred years. In Roman times, citizenship began to take on more of the character of a relationship based on law, with less political participation than in ancient Greece but a widening sphere of who was considered to be a citizen. In the Middle Ages in Europe, citizenship was primarily identified with commercial and secular life in the growing cities, and it came to be seen as membership in emerging nation-states. In modern democracies, citizenship has contrasting senses, including a liberal-individualist view emphasizing needs and entitlements and legal protections for essentially passive political beings, and a civic-republican view emphasizing political participation and seeing citizenship as an active relation with specific privileges and obligations.
While citizenship has varied considerably throughout history, there are some common elements of citizenship over time. Citizenship bonds extend beyond basic kinship ties to unite people of different genetic backgrounds, that is, citizenship is more than a clan or extended kinship network. It generally describes the relation between a person and an overall political entity such as a city-state or nation and signifies membership in that body. It is often based on, or a function of, some form of military service or expectation of future military service. It is generally characterized by some form of political participation, although the extent of such participation can vary considerably from minimal duties such as voting to active service in government. And citizenship, throughout history, has often been seen as an ideal state, closely allied with freedom, an important status with legal aspects including rights, and it has sometimes been seen as a bundle of rights or a right to have rights.[3] Last, citizenship almost always has had an element of exclusion, in the sense that citizenship derives meaning, in part, by excluding non-citizens from basic rights and privileges.