All categories

3 years ago

In Tinker v. Des Moines, why was it considered protected speech for students to wear armbands?

History

2 answers:

RoseWind [281]3 years ago

4 0

The answer is B their action was never disruptive

erik [133]3 years ago

4 0

I believe the answer is: b.Their action was not disruptive.

The actions of the students are protected under the 1st amendment which guarantee the freedom of speech (speech in this context could be done both verbally or through action). The only exception for the protection arise only if the students promote violence through their speech or doing their speech by disrupting other civilian.

You might be interested in

How to write an essay

Westkost [7]

Answer:

With words and letters

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Navajos who were not trained in the code could not understand the coded messages.

Zolol [24]

Answer:

give me a minute to find the answer

Explanation:

6 0

4 years ago

Which of the following describes why the United States Senate did not want to sign the Treaty of Versailles?

jeka57 [31]

Answer:

A triangle is shown Below based on this triangle which one of the following statements is true

Explanation:A triangle is shown Below based on this triangle which one of the following statements is trueA triangle is shown Below based on this triangle which one of the following statements is trueA triangle is shown Below based on this triangle which one of the following statements is trueA triangle is shown Below based on this triangle which one of the following statements is trueA triangle is shown Below based on this triangle which one of the following statements is trueA triangle is shown Below based on this triangle which one of the following statements is trueA triangle is shown Below based on this triangle which one of the following statements is trueA triangle is shown Below based on this triangle which one of the following statements is true

3 0

3 years ago

Can you help what is the difference between Darwin and lamarick

ella [17]

Answer:

Their theories are different because Lamarck thought that organisms changed out of need and after a change in the environment and Darwin thought organisms changed by chance when they were born and before there was a change in the environment.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

What is a long term effect of the discovery of oil at Spindletop in 1901?

Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

It transitioned the economy of Texas from agricultural to industrial, because before, there were cattle ranges and mostly focused on the cotton and cattle industries. They would herd the cattle up to Kansas where cows would be shipped off to the East.

The cattle and cotton industry was very profitable most of the time, which led to them being the main attraction.

There were some people who thought, "Hey! Imma just start drilling for oil in some place that I just bought because why not!"

Then they hit oil and created a massive influx of profit, which led to other people thinking, "Hey! Deez people made a lotta dolla bills yall so Imma copy them!"

Finally, people started drilling for oil all over the place (even in their backyards) and transitioned the economy to oil and coal mining.

Even during WW2, miners were drilling for oil to power their fighting machines.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago