During the 1937’s
have a good dayyy
I’m so sorry if it’s wrong but I believe it’s either between... the first option- move toward more or the 3rd option- cautiously embraced. But if I were to choose which one I think I would go with the 1st option as my answer
Answer: move toward more
Explanation: Because of nearly all composers use dissonance in their music. Without dissonance, there would be no tension and release in music and it would all be VERY boring and bland. Dissonances are nothing new at all and certainly not restricted to the 20th century; in the 14th and 15th centuries these could be quite harsh and not always resolved in the way we would expect today.
Dissonance adds expression to music and as composers' techniques became more and more sophisticated, so did the harmonic language. Dissonance can be used for musical 'colour' and to create extreme tension and drama in music.
In short, composers in the 20th (and 21st) century used dissonance for very similar reasons to composers in every other century.
According to yahoo.com
<span> They both agree that all citizens should have a right to run for government positions and laws should be the same for all beings. They both agree that no man, or women in D’Aelders’ argument, should be treated as a lesser being and as someone of the same value or worth. <span>
</span></span>
The correct answer is C) Both documents drew on the "natural law" philosophy of John Locke.
A - Declaration of Independence doesn't speak of a divine Creator.
B - They both speak of the enlightenment.
D - They both mention it.
