In June 1812, the United States declared war against Great Britain in reaction to three issues: the British economic blockade of France, the induction of thousands of neutral American seamen into the British Royal Navy against their will, and the British support of hostile Indian tribes along the Great Lakes frontier. A faction of Congress, made up mostly of western and southern congressmen, had been advocating the declaration of war for several years. These “War Hawks,” as they were known, hoped that war with Britain, which was preoccupied with its struggle against Napoleonic France, would result in U.S. territorial gains in Canada and British-protected Florida.
Answer:
Mexico would have been the champs
<span>True. With rioting happening in Berlin in 1848 and rioters demanding a constitution, it became clear that the only way to avoid further destruction and calamity was for the Prussian king Frederick William IV to promise a constitution. He upheld his end of the bargain to end the riots.</span>
Simone de Beauvoir, a French author who was of great importance to the emergence of the post war women's liberation movement. In 1949, she published her highly influential work, The Second Sex. As a result of male-dominated societies, she argued, women had been defined by their differences from men and consequently received second-class status. Her book influenced both the American and European women's movements.
Hope this helps
The Great Society saw government as providing a hand up, not a handout. The cornerstone was a thriving economy (which the 1964 tax cut sparked); in such circumstances, most Americans would be able to enjoy the material blessings of society.
<span>Others aspects would be the kind of help most of us got from our parents health care, education and training, and housing, as well as a nondiscriminatory shot at employment‹to share in our nation's wealth. </span>
<span>Also, but not the cornerstone, was poverty. If the Great Society had not achieved that dramatic reduction in poverty, and the nation had not maintained it, 24 million more Americans would today be living below the poverty level.</span>
