1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artist 52 [7]
3 years ago
11

A defendant was charged with the murder of a victim. During the course of the criminal trial, a witness testified on behalf of t

he defense that, at the time the murder took place, he saw someone who looked like the defendant dancing at a local nightclub. The defendant is eventually acquitted of the charge. Following the acquittal, the appropriate survivors of the victim bring a wrongful death action against the defendant. As part of her defense, the defendant wishes to introduce the testimony given at the criminal trial by the witness, who the defendant shows is now incarcerated in a prison in another state. Is the testimony of the witness admissible?
Social Studies
1 answer:
almond37 [142]3 years ago
8 0

Explanation:

The witness's testimony is inadmissible.

Under Federal Rule 804(b)(1), the testimony of a witness who is unavailable, given at another hearing, is admissible in a subsequent trial if there is sufficient similarity of parties and issues so that the opportunity to develop testimony or cross-examination at the prior hearing was meaningful.

The former testimony is admissible upon any trial of the same subject matter. The party against whom the testimony is offered or, in civil cases, the party's predecessor in interest must have been a party in the former action. "Predecessor in interest" includes one in a privity relationship with the party, such as grantor-grantee, testator-executor, life tenant-remainder man, and joint tenants.

These requirements are intended to ensure that the party against whom the testimony is offered (or a predecessor in interest in a civil case) had an adequate opportunity and motive to cross-examine the witness.

In the civil suit here at issue, the survivors of the victim were not parties to the criminal case, nor were they in privity with any such party. (The parties to that case were the defendant and the government.) These survivors, who are the plaintiffs in the instant litigation, are the parties against whom the testimony of the witness is being offered. Because they were not parties to the action in which the witness testified, they had no opportunity to cross-examine him. Even if the government had a similar motive to cross-examine the witness as do the plaintiffs in the current action, that is not sufficient to make the government a predecessor in interest to the plaintiffs. Consequently, the testimony of the witness does not come within the former testimony exception to the hearsay rule, and the testimony is inadmissible hearsay.   A victim and his former business.

You might be interested in
Which psychologists are most likely to criticize standardized personality tests for failing to capture the unique subjective exp
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

Humanistic.

Explanation:

In psychology, the humanistic approach was born as an alternative to the behaviorist and psychodynamic approaches.

Humanistic psychologists reject the deterministic assumptions often made in the behaviorist and psychodynamic perspectives. According to humanistic psychologists, both of these other approaches dehumanize human beings and see them as people who are determined by external forces rather than people with all the inner abilities and capacities to cope with life.

Humanism states that people are basically good, and have an innate need to make themselves and the world better, they also have an inner tendency to self-actualization. This approach also thinks that the subjective  experiences of the individual are really important, therefore they study personality and personal experiences from the point of view of the individual's own subjective experience.  

Thus, <u>the psychologists that are most likely to criticize standardized personality tests for </u><u>failing to capture the unique subjective experience of the individual personality</u><u> </u>would be the humanistic psychologists.

3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP - The Green Hornet The Corpse That Wasn't There<br><br>What Is This Story Really About?
Arisa [49]

Answer: The Green Hornet was a criminal drama, a radio-show in 1936.

The Green Hornet was not an extremely popular show, but it had some fame. In it the main character sought to solve crimes, and even infiltrated a faction of criminals to do so. At first the police thought he was a thug too.

7 0
3 years ago
The fact that technology enables us to consider sending enhanced older people into war _______.
AysviL [449]

Answer:

According to the statement, is a good example of how technological advances change the questions that society must address. It changes it to why send the older people instead of young people.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
________ research focused on how some people are motivated by internal aspirations and life goals, whereas others are primarily
podryga [215]

<u>Frederick Herzberg's</u> research focused on how some people are motivated by internal aspirations and life goals, whereas others are primarily motivated by the job conditions.

<u>Explanation</u>:

Frederick Irving Herzberg was a famous psychologist who lived in America. He was known for his motivator-hygiene theory. He states that people are generally influenced by two sets of factors.

According to Frederick, hygiene factors don’t contribute to motivation, but absence of hygiene may cause lowering the motivation level.

Frederick says that there are many factors in the workplace which induces motivation for the employee. Certain factors contribute job satisfaction, while other set of factors may cause dissatisfaction.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these best describes the scientific method?
skelet666 [1.2K]

Answer:

Option: B. A constant set of conditions in an experiment.

Explanation:

The scientific method is the process of the hypothesis that examined through scientific way including experiments or observations. The Scientific method is a process of inductive reasoning from observations and verification by experiments.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to thamhain and wilemon, _____ is the ability to improve a worker's position.
    5·1 answer
  • Can you answer plz thanks
    11·1 answer
  • How did the movement of people from Asia into North America during the Ice Age change history
    13·1 answer
  • Elisabeth is a preschooler who spends much of her time in sociodramatic play. she is likely to be seen as __________ by observer
    8·1 answer
  • If an applicant is experienced, has a solid work history, and is staying within her field, the most effective format for her res
    13·1 answer
  • Unlike the GATT, the WTO has enforcement power through its Dispute Settlement Panel, which is empowered to interpret WTO agreeme
    12·1 answer
  • True or False?
    9·1 answer
  • Why was the Fourteenth Amendment necessary if the Declaration of Independence stated that all men were created equal?
    9·1 answer
  • _____________ is the mental structure that aids in the processing and interpretation of information.
    9·1 answer
  • The outcome of multiple deprivations that prevent individuals or groups from participating fully in the economic, social, and po
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!