1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirza4 [7]
3 years ago
7

Why do Justice Scalia and Justice Stevens both devote such large portions of their opinions to analyzing early American statutes

and to reviewing the writings of the authors of the Constitution (the Framers)? Does an examination of his torical materials help the Court decide a case today?
History
1 answer:
Mrac [35]3 years ago
4 0

America is a common law system, so you build cases and decisions by building the rationale for decisions on the arguments of Judges before you through the use of precedent.

So, Scalia and Stevens and others would want an argument to be based on the framers or previous decisions to show how established the idea is in American jurisprudence.

You might be interested in
Please help! Will mark a brainliest! :)<br><br> There is a pic!!
MrRissso [65]

the answer to your problem is option b

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use the graph and your knowledge of social studies to answer the following question.
alex41 [277]
For the answer to the question above.
The best answer I can give is letter B.
During the civil war, there was also a competition in the global market on the supply of cotton so Europe sought other suppliers from India and Egypt and this is why the price is down after 1865
6 0
2 years ago
Which idea is King trying to leave his audience with his Nobel Prize acceptance speech.
Sophie [7]
Martin Lurther King Jr is by far one of my favourite historical figures. What he did is very inspirational, and teaches many of us (not only the minority) that we can still make a difference, even in times of difficulty. 
At rechieving his Nobel Peace Prize, Martin Lurther King Jr, delivered a speech that touched many hearts. It was about the fight to freedom.
"...win the racial injustice...I accept...we move with determination...establish a rain of freedom...our children crying out of brotherhood...trying to secure the right to vote...who were brutalized...unrelenting struggle...this movement is [to achieve]...that non-violence is the answer to the political and moral questions on our time...without resorting to violence and oppression...have demonstrated that non-violence...is a POWERFUL moral force..."\
Answer: D

I hope this helps :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This half Native American and African American was the first person to be killed during the Boston Massacre.
inysia [295]

Answer:

C. Crispus Attacks

Explanation:

I remember learning it in class not too long ago

5 0
3 years ago
Imagine you have always lived in a state with plenty of land where you worked on a farm and had horses. You did not have many pe
qwelly [4]
Is this an opinion I say Idaho but if not I say New Mexico
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does senator Smith respond to the articles written about him?
    14·1 answer
  • Why were colonist angered by new taxes after French and Indian war?
    14·1 answer
  • Benito Mussolini introduced a political philosophy known as what?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the New Deal? to lift the United States out of the Depression to weaken totalitarian governments in Euro
    9·1 answer
  • How many languages has Anne Frank’s diary been published in
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is correct?
    6·2 answers
  • This battle stopped Union plans to invade Texas and took place two months after
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HURRY
    12·1 answer
  • What is the term for a person who has certain rights and responsibilities in a city-state or nation
    9·1 answer
  • Was Barack Obama a good president? Why or why not?<br><br> Im not American sooo... pleasee
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!