1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lora16 [44]
3 years ago
15

Ruggers is a maker of a range of highly popular cruise motorcycles. Tim buys a Ruggers motorcycle from a dealership and suffers

an accident. While recuperating from his injuries, he learns that Ruggers has recalled all motorcycles it had manufactured and sold in the previous two years, owing to a previously unknown defect in their braking systems. Tim brings a product liability lawsuit against the motorcycle manufacturer and claims $50,000 in damages. The defect in the motorcycle is found to be half responsible for the accident, while Tim's own negligence of traffic rules contributed to the rest. Under the doctrine of contributory negligence, what would be the ruling of the court hearing this case
Social Studies
2 answers:
Otrada [13]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Tim can not recover any damages from Rugger the manufacture of the motorcycle.

Explanation:

Tim buys a Ruggers motorcycle from a dealership and suffers an accident,while recuperating from his injuries, he learns that Ruggers has recalled all motorcycles it had manufactured and sold in the previous two years, owing to a previously unknown defect in their braking systems.Tim brings a product liability lawsuit against the motorcycle manufacturer and claims $50,000 in damages.However,the defect in the motorcycle is found to be half responsible for the accident, while <em>Tim's own negligence of traffic rules contributed to the rest.</em>

Doctrine of contributory negligence is a common law that stated that if a person was injured in part due to his or her own negligence i.e their action which contributed to that accident, the injured party would not be entitled to collect any damages from the other party who was supposedly allege to cause the accident.

Therefore, because of Tim negligence which contribute to the accident he had, he will not be grant damage in the court of law which will rule under the doctrine of contributory negligence.

Mrrafil [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Tim cannot recover any damages from the motorcycle manufacturer.

Explanation: Tim will not be entitled to receive any damages from Rugger, the motorcycle manufacturer according to the doctrine of contributory negligence.

The doctrine of contributory negligence explains that if an individual's negligence contributed in part to the injury suffered by such individual. Then, such person will not be entitled to any damage fee from the other party supposedly regarded to as the cause of the injury.

You might be interested in
What is the Alphabetical Order of the States?
aivan3 [116]

Answer:

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
True or False: The author of this article is in support of citizenship tests.
Tamiku [17]

true  

a true stament has to mater

7 0
3 years ago
Plss answer these questions!!!
Fudgin [204]
You have such nice writing, i like cursive writing :-)
5 0
3 years ago
How has the force of deposition hindered Arkansas?
STatiana [176]
It is A !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Aldrich is a nineteen-year-old college sophomore writing a term paper on the topic of honesty. At first, he believes in the sayi
jek_recluse [69]

Answer: b. dialectical thinking.

Explanation:

Dialectical thinking is a way of reasoning in which the person thinks and synthesis the two opposing viewpoints on the same situation, topic or object. The dialectical thinking is a feature of one's cognitive ability.

The dialectical thinking is supported by the new experiences and interpersonal interaction with the daily life situations.

According to the given situation, here, Aldrich is showing a change in opinion about the same topic. This is the outcome of the dialectical thinking which has been generated due to comparison between previously known facts that honesty is a best policy but honesty is not always beneficial for the person thus has created two opposing view points. This is the outcome of development of the cognitive flexibility.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A group of people <br> A. Perspectives <br> B. Circumstances <br> C. Institutions <br> D. Community
    15·2 answers
  • The typical personality of people with anorexia nervosa is described as
    15·1 answer
  • A 2009 national survey of Americans found that ___________ percent of men age 70 and older reported having sexual intercourse at
    9·1 answer
  • The speaker's statement as to the behavioral change she or he wants from the audience is known as the:
    5·1 answer
  • In Piaget's theory, the concrete operational stage Select one: a. involves children's gradual realization that they exist indepe
    6·1 answer
  • ​____________ is the tradition of allowing a senator to reject the governor’s appointment of a political enemy from the senator’
    7·1 answer
  • 2:<br>Why are there so few people in the Himalayan Regir<br>on of Nepal zo<br>lon​
    7·2 answers
  • May pagkakataon ba na dapat itigil ang pagpupulong at ipagpaliban na lamang ang ibang mga ayten ng adyenda?
    13·1 answer
  • Propose TWO sustainable ways in which businesses could assist the schools to
    7·1 answer
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST WILL REPORT SPAM AND LINKS
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!