Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
The Big Stick policy applies to the foreign policy of President Roosevelt, who talks quietly but wears a white baton. Its type of international relations was described as the practice of intellectual forethought or strong leadership far ahead of a likely crisis. For Western Europe, they felt most of everything that the U.S. would have a duty to protect security and stability by assuming a defensive position throughout the West.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
According to Dr. John C Green, debates actually matters in an election. However, the impact of debates comes in two different folds.
Firstly, those that actually watch the debate. These people get the information directly from the aspirants and it shifts their opinions about who they will vote for eventually.
On the other hand, are those that actually didn't watch the debate. These people often more than those that watch the debate, are influenced by the media narratives that come after the debates. And in a way, it also changes their opinions about whom exactly they would give their votes.
He however concluded that it is difficult to measure the impact of the debate on election outcomes. In his word "just because people get information does not mean they will be persuaded one way or another."
<span>1. </span>The
correct answer here is D. Japan’s economy was in a great state after the World War
I but as the Great Depression hit so did the Japanese economy plummet. Japan has
a few national resources and relies mainly on import. Because of the Great Depression
the trade with the foreign nations was in ruins which led to the economic crisis.
Because Japan was lacking resources and land space they invaded Manchuria.
<span>2. </span>The
correct answer here is C. Both Italy and Japan believed that they were not
rewarded adequately for their efforts in the war. Both expected more territory
and were left wanting. This can be seen as one of the reasons why these
countries developed later as they did and sided with Germany in the WWII.
<span>4. </span>The
correct answer here is A. Unfortunately, the League of Nations was not very strong.
They had no army and the both Italy and Germany largely ignored their decrees.
The League of Nations reacted the only way it could and that was by imposing sanctions
and enforcing trade embargoes on these states.
Hope this helps, try looking it up
