Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
In the long run, perfectly competitive firms will react to profits by increasing production.
Firms in a perfectly competitive world earn zero profit in the long run. While firms can earn accounting profits in the long run, they cannot earn economic profits.
In the long run, perfectly competitive firms will react to profits by decreasing production. CORRECT: In the long run, perfectly competitive firms will respond to losses by exiting the market. In the long run, perfectly competitive firms will respond to losses by reducing production.
A perfectly competitive market achieves long‐run equilibrium when all firms are earning zero economic profits and when the number of firms in the market is not changing.
In the long run, profits and losses are eliminated because an infinite number of firms are producing infinitely divisible, homogeneous products. Firms experience no barriers to entry and all consumers have perfect information.
Learn more about a perfectly competitive firm here: brainly.com/question/25327136
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. Straight-Line method:
Year depreciation = (Cost - Residual value) / useful life
= (130,000 - 10,000) / 6
= $20,000
2019 = $20,000 2020 = $20,000
b. Double declining.
= Twice the rate of straight-line.
= 1 / 6 * 2
= 33%
2019 2020
= 130,000 * 33% = (130,000 - 42,900) * 33%
= $42,900 = $28,743
c. Units of Production:
Rate per unit = (Cost - residual) / Number of units in lifetime
= (130,000 - 10,000) / 1,000,000
= $0.12 per unit
2019 2020
= 180,000 * 0.12 = 140,000 * 0.12
= $21,600 = $16,800
Answer: Po = Do(1+g)/Ke-g
Po = $3.10(1-0.109)/0.13 - (-0.109)
Po = $3.10(0.891)/0.13+0.109
Po = $3.10(0.891)/0.239
Po = $11.56
Explanation: The current market price of the stock equals the current dividend paid multiplied by 1+g divided by the excess of cost of equity over growth rate. The growth rate is negative in this case, thus, the growth rate would be deducted from 1. Moreso, the growth rate will be added to cost of equity since it is negative. Thus, the amount that the investor will be willing to pay is $11.56.
