1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergeinik [125]
3 years ago
13

Why did President Roosevelt push Congress to insert "cash and carry" provisions into the Neutrality Acts? (1 point) to make it p

ossible for American businesses to profit from wartime trade to give the United States the chance to bankrupt Axis powers with high costs to prevent Germany and Japan from buying war materials from the United States to enable the United States to aid the Axis powers without a military commitment
History
2 answers:
ICE Princess25 [194]3 years ago
8 0
A would be the correct answer
Nonamiya [84]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is “to make it possible for American businesses to profit from wartime trade”

The Neutrality Acts was a series of bills passed by the US Congress, those bills reinforced the US isolationism and non-interventionism in other countries wars and affairs. But Roosevelt pushed the “cash and carry” into the Neutrality Acts. The Cash and Carry provision allowed countries to buy American arms as long as they paid in cash and they transported them in their own ships. So despite the fact that the US remained neutral in wars, the country still profited with them.

You might be interested in
PLZ I ONLY HAVE A COUPLE MINS LEFT! Describe the reading habits of Americans in the late 1800s, and explain how different kinds
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

People enjoyed reading since school was mandatory. People made newspapers for people who liked gossip and scandals.  Others made dime novels for people who were poor.  Realist writers also made articles about the harsh life. Then people made magazines for woman's interest

Hope this Helps!!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which group was most likely to oppose american imperialism in the late nineteenth century?
ikadub [295]
A group called " The New Left
4 0
4 years ago
Compare and contrast in the Mexican and the Brazilian revolution.​
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

All revolutions that exist or have taken place in this world are full of the revolution traits that were evidently pointedout throughout the book, Anatomy of Revolution written by Crane Brinton. One classification of the revolution that was mentioned in this piece of literature was, “A revolution is a drastic, sudden substitution of one group in charge of a territorial political entity by another group hitherto not running that government.” Some revolutions may approach this definition in a varied way. Many people think that revolutions only cause trouble and dismay. All the same, have you every considered of a peaceful revolution? Those two words “peaceful” and “revolution” may seem ironic together. Nevertheless, there is a severe illustration that had occurred in the past that proves the existence of this satirical phrase and the unique way of approaching a revolution: the Brazilian Revolution. In addition, I will be comparing the similarities that were showed among the Mexican Revolution and the Brazilian Revolution. Due to the reason of proving that the “peaceful revolution” is still considered an act of Enlightened citizens fighting for their rights. To start out, there are three major parts to the revolution, according to the reading that was in Anatomy of Revolution: cause, sequences, and the consequences. The cause of the revolution mostly states the basic ideas on whyand how the revolution sparked. In this case, Brazilian Revolution, the Portuguese all of a sudden appear out of the blue to the sacred land of Brazil. They were on their way from fleeing their country due to the attack of Napoleon. These unexpected people arrived at the land of Brazil and unbelievingly they start ruling over the natives. Of course the Brazilians were baffled by this action. The Portuguese start taking away the Brazilians’ privileges and rights. To illustrate, the Portuguese banned the Brazilians from trading with foreigners, growing crops or manufacturing goods that have the potential to compete with Spain. In yet another example, if we compare this event to the Mexican Revolution, even during the Mexican revolution, the Spaniards, who came to the land of Mexico

without warning started governing over the Mexicans. They used Mexicans as slaves and they received meager treatment and had to face the harsh reality. They gathered an unreliable amount of taxes from the natives, which, in the end,angered the lower statues and caused the revolt to take place. Even better, during the courses of the revolutions, both the Mexican and the Brazilian Revolutions created a contract of a constitution that had all the requirements of the radicals documented on it. At first, the rulers or the statue who was in absolute power, refused to sign or agree to the constitution. This lead to more riots and conflicts. Some revolutions, such as the Mexican revolution, created bloody wars and fights in order to gain the approval of their constitution. In other cases, such as the Brazilian Revolution, they cause no destruction on people’s lives and they did not carry out bloody wars-they decided to solve problems “peacefully.” After revolting a little more, the head ofthe conservatives decides to sign and be part of the contract, which leads towards the end of the revolution and this is the stage in which the radicals’ desires are fulfilled. In yet another example, the Mexican Revolution created the Inquala plan: whichcontained the three conditions: “One, Mexico would become an independent monarchy governed by transplanted king Ferdinand. Two, Creolles and Pennensulars would have equal human rights and civil liberties. Three, the Roman Catholic Churches could keep their privileges.” More precisely, the Brazilian Revolution created a petition that eight-thousand Brazilians signed, that asked King John to let his son, Dom Pedro, to rule this country. Eventually, Pedro gave the independence to the Brazilian, and he led theconstitutional monarchy in Brazil. Further more, in the end, or in the consequence, it seems that the rebels achieved what they were enthusiastic to posses. In much the same manner, both revolutions, the Mexican and the Brazilian Revolution, had a positive conclusion. Or in other words, they both gained freedom and independence, along with the equal rights and privileges they couldn’t enjoy and taste before. Taking these two revolutions as an example, you can realize that even a “peaceful revolution” canhave the same results as the violent revolution-the Mexican Revolution. Even though the two revolutions went through very similar, but very unique paths, their results were identical, which is all that matters in the end and the only thing that is taken credit

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

~Heaven~

6 0
2 years ago
How did the fall of the soviet union effect poland
otez555 [7]
The Origins and Evolution of the Soviet State

The Soviet state was born in 1917. That year, the revolutionary Bolsheviks overthrew the Russian czar and established a socialist state in the territory that had once belonged to the Russian empire. In 1922, Russia proper joined its far-flung republics in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The first leader of this Soviet state was the Marxist revolutionary Vladimir Lenin.

<span>Did You Know? In 1988, Time magazine selected Mikhail Gorbachev to be its “Man of the Year” for his work toward ending the Cold War. The next year, it named him its “Man of the Decade.” In 1990, Gorbachev won the Nobel Peace Prize.</span>

The Soviet Union was supposed to be “a society of true democracy,” but in many ways it was no less repressive than the czarist autocracy that preceded it. It was ruled by a single party–the Communist Party–that demanded the allegiance of every Russian citizen. After 1924, when the dictator Joseph Stalin came to power, the state exercised totalitarian control over the economy, administering all industrial activity and establishing collective farms. It also controlled every aspect of political and social life. People who argued against Stalin’s policies were arrested and sent to labor camps or executed.


6 0
3 years ago
Why did antislavery Senator Daniel Webster agree to compromise with proslavery senators?
Andre45 [30]

Antislavery Senator Daniel Webster agreed to compromise with proslavery senators because <em>A. He was willing to compromise to keep the United States together</em>. Senator Calhoun's speech stated that southerners should have the right to take slaves, as their personal properties, anywhere. Although an abolitionist, Senator Daniel Webster was willing to comprise to keep the Union together, that was more important to him than free soil.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Identify a reason countries paid tribute
    14·1 answer
  • Texas was a independent republic territory or nation before the U.S accepted as a state...
    13·2 answers
  • What is Mein Kampf?
    5·2 answers
  • During the Renaissance, a new intellectual movement known as humanism evolved. What was the significance of the humanist movemen
    5·2 answers
  • Why did lowercas voters tend to support Andrew Jackson
    15·1 answer
  • Write as a square of a binomial: <br><br><br>1: 4x^2+12x+9<br><br><br><br>2: 10xy +0.25x^2+100y^2
    13·1 answer
  • I need the answer for free
    11·2 answers
  • Imagine you are a fictional person from a different time covered in this lesson. Your task is to write an imaginary letter to yo
    13·1 answer
  • What did the United States gain from Pinckney's Treaty?​
    8·2 answers
  • After the Kansas-Nebraska Act, what party did antislavery Democrats form?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!