The correct answer is C) it argued that Puritans admitted their own mistakes and tried to make up for them, which is a value the author believes Americans still practice today.
Paragraph 7 contributes to the development of ideas in the excerpt Puritan laws and characters in the following way: "it argued that Puritans admitted their own mistakes and tried to make up for them, which is a value the author believes Americans still practice today."
In paragraph 7, the author describes how Puritans were intolerant, but not as intolerant as the English. He said they were devoted to duty, fear of God, loved liberty, and hated tyranny. The author says that Puritans killed some Quakers buy confessed their mistake by repealing their own law.
The other options of the question were A) it explains how, despite their rigid laws and character, Puritans had some positive characteristics and should be viewed favorably in American history. B) it points out that Puritans were more open-minded than other European settlers. D) It emphasizes the Puritan's mistakes such as executing innocent Quakers.
It was to prevent slavery in new the lands gained from the Mexican War.
Known as the “Moses of her people,” Harriet Tubman was enslaved, escaped, and helped others gain their freedom as a “conductor" of the Underground Railroad. Tubman also served as a scout, spy, guerrilla soldier, and nurse for the Union Army during the Civil War.
The answer to your question is D.
The actual definition of SCARCITY: the state of being scarce or in a short supply; shortage
Which means that there's not enough of something to fully meet the requirements for the demand.
Hope this helps!!
Answer:
that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
Explanation: