<u>Answer:</u>
Parents use the strategy of encouragement which allows the child to indicate an interest and then elaborate on it.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- In order to devise the inclination of the child, the parents implement various methods to make the child show or develop interest in certain disciplines.
- It is through encouragement from the parents, that the child finds it easy to speak about his/her interests easily and seek the necessary primary opinions regarding the discipline of his/her interest.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: What part of Piaget´s theory is Trevor demonstrating, would be: symbolic thinking.
Explanation:
The development of cognitive capacities in both children and adults is a very interesting topic. How children think, how they reason and get to know the world and make sense of it is a topic that has been handled by several experts in psychology, but none as much as Jean Piaget, whose theories of child cognitive development have shaped up until now a lot of what we know about childhood development. In the case of Trevor, the three year old who is associating the action of going to work for his father, with going to the coffee shop, and thus ends up with the question if his father´s office is at the coffee shop, the part of Paiget´s theory that applies is symbolic thinking. Trevor has associated two concepts: his father going to work, and the coffee shop, and assigned them the idea that his father´s office is at the coffee shop, because that is where he sees his father going when he heads off to work. This is characteristic of symbolic meaning.
Just took the assignment, it's 1, 3, 4, 6
Specie economy. Specie are precious metals and gemstones. It leads to hoarding. Capital flows in only one direction: from the site of extraction, the periphery, to the ruler, the core. This leads to economic slowdown and stagnation. That's all I could think of. I kind of went off on it after "specie," but specie isn't a complete description so that's why. I'm probably missing something huge.
We did have a gold standard up until 1972, when Nixon took us off of it. I guess that's another way to describe mercantilism: it's not a debt economy. In capitalism, capital is fluid, meaning it flows many ways, not just the one way as in mercantilism. Debt, then, creates profit. The government in a capitalist system wants to assume as much as the public debt as it can. It does not want a large stockpile of capital sitting inert in private hands. That is bad for democracy. The word is "inimical."
When the government borrows, it doesn't have to print money to finance ventures. Buying things like an aircraft carrier is a venture. Our investments in overseas oil fields are ventures. The interest on these kinds of things is enormous and is used to keep the economy rolling. You borrow, then you finance ventures to pay off your debtors. The deficit is the difference between what you borrow and what you pay back. A surplus means you borrowed more so you have more incoming than outgoing. A deficit can mean you are being fiscally responsible since it shows that you are borrowing less than you are paying back. A deficit is an indicator--AN indicator, depending on other things, but a strong one--of a strong or rising military.
Debt is more reliable for paying for war than specie is, and capitalism is a better engine for economic growth than class struggle. Both class struggle and mercantilism are closed systems, and that's what makes them fail. Mercantilism implies hoarding, and class struggle implies starving.
