3 years ago

Which do you think is more reliable – a secondary source or a primary source?

1 answer:

Colt1911 [192]3 years ago

8 0

I think it depends on the question, but primary source is probably more reliable because it would be the original document. For example a diary of documented events from an explorer for example would be more reliable then a website about it. Have a nice rest of your day :)

You might be interested in

Question 16 saved one of the europeans' strongest weapons against the incas was question 16 options: surprise attacks. trained s

konstantin123 [22]

One of the Europeans' strongest weapons against the Incas was DISEASE.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which two sentences best express how "A Poison Tree" transforms the story referred to in the previous question?A) Similar to the

Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

the answer is a i literally got it correct

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

2) Close Reading: What themes or similarities do you see amongst these four images?

mina [271]

Is it possible for you to add a picture

7 0

3 years ago

What position did the United States take during the Indochina Wars

ch4aika [34]

<span> It worked against Cambodia because a </span>communist<span> government had risen there. It supported France because it wanted to limit communism in Southeast Asia. It opposed Indochina because of the corruption of the Diem government. Hope it helped.</span>

7 0

3 years ago

As a result of the U.S. Mexican War,the southern boundary of Texas was-

Alexus [3.1K]

Answer: The war officially ended with the February 2, 1848, signing in Mexico of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Mexico gave up all claims to Texas and recognized the Rio Grande as America's southern boundary.

Explanation: Hope this helped!! :D

4 0

3 years ago