Which do you think is more reliable – a secondary source or a primary source?

1 answer:

Colt1911 [192]2 years ago

8 0

I think it depends on the question, but primary source is probably more reliable because it would be the original document. For example a diary of documented events from an explorer for example would be more reliable then a website about it. Have a nice rest of your day :)

You might be interested in

During the Progressive Era, some politicians were successful in getting initiatives and referendums added in many states. What w

lana [24]

Answer:

more people became directly involved in government

Explanation:

Brainliet Pls

4 0

2 years ago

If you studied the world in spatial terms as a geographer what would you most likely focus on?

a_sh-v [17]

Answer:

Explanation

This is a personal question

I would focus on countries and their properties

6 0

3 years ago

Which statement would most likely begin a discussion of the origins of the Protestant Reformation? (1 point)

lorasvet [3.4K]

no , it is b just took the quiz

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What percent of the south had slaves?

marshall27 [118]

Answer:

1.4%

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which chain of events correctly accounts for the conditions described in the excerpt?

Umnica [9.8K]

The right answer is:

A: The stock market crash caused a panic > people rushed to pull money out of the banks > Banks did not have enough money for everyone.

Explanation

The aforementioned excerpt is from "American Life Histories: Manuscripts from the Federal Writers' Project, 1936-1940" and it describes a group of men in New York City who made a living by collecting and selling junk from their pushcarts.

It specifically refers to the stock market crash of 1929 during which there was a collapse of stock prices. It was the worst decline in U.S. history.

People were forced to sell businesses and take out their life savings. Unemployment took place later as businesses failed.

3 0

3 years ago