One reason that made the Revolutionary-era poets use the iambic meter was that this meter imitated the classical poetry style.
<h3>Who were the Revolutionary-era poets?</h3>
This name is given to famous poets during the American Revolution, which was massive movement led by the colonies to become independent from the British Crown. Due to this, the themes in this poems are often related to that conflict.
<h3>What meter did the poets use?</h3>
The poets mainy used the iamb. This metric unit implies using sets of two syllable in which the first syllable is unstressed.
<h3>Why did the poets choose this pattern?</h3>
The most likely reason is that the revolutionary-era poems were inspired by classical poems and it was common classical poems used this metric.
Note: This question is incomplete; here is the complete question:
One possible reason that the Revolutionary-era poets used the1. __ meter was to imitate the2. ___ style.
1. trochaic
spondaic
iambic
anapestic
2. romantic
british
classical
dramatic
Learn more about the iamb in: brainly.com/question/1287268
#SPJ1
<span>B) Animals used in a Species Survival Plan are sometimes taken out of the public viewing areas for a private, less stressful area to breed and care for their offspring in the first critical weeks.
B is the best option of the ones we can see. You didn't include the sentence as is so I don't know if A is better. I do know for a fact that options C and D are grammatically incorrect. The difference in the sentences is really the use of the adjective phrase (used in a Species Survival Plan). This phrase clarifies which animals are moved out of viewing areas.
</span>
-They are weak, ignorant, and cowardly men...they are ignorant and made weak because they don't have a machete.
-For the second one it does not say anything about christianity possibly if there is more of the passage.
-They are not experienced warriors...definitely because they did not bring the weapon for battle.
-They are worthless, empty men--maybe I mean they are technically empty because they left there machete so now their sheath is empty and it is kind of worthless unless they are ninjas but even still in that situation it would be a miracle to go to battle without a weapon and not die.
answer: No Sacagawea wasn't very essential to the expedition's success. Without or with her, I they could have still made it. The baby she had with her was slowing them down, and kept the journey harder for these two young men. They ended up leaving her at the village because it was to dangerous. After that the two young men flourished with success. They got done in the matters on 2 1/2 years. With her and her baby it would have made it harder. Her people did help with the transportation, but even without the horses they would have made it eventually. This is my response arguing whether Sacagawea was important to this success.
Explanation: This is just my opinion on this story.
But this should help.
