One rhetorical appeal in Anthony's speech that is ineffective is her use of pathos. In describing the American government as the most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe, she made an assumption that was likely unfounded.
<h3>What ineffective rhetorical appeal was used by Anthony?</h3>
In her speech about women's right to vote, we can see that Susan B. Anthony employed pathos to raise the emotions of the people toward the government who did not yet understand the need to allow women to vote. We can see in her argument that she used an appeal to emotions by describing the government in very strong and hateful terms.
This would have hurt her argument because the audience might have been enraged at such a description of the government. Anthony should have stuck to logical reasoning to improve the weight of her argument. This would have gained more acceptance.
Learn more about Susan B. Anthony here:
brainly.com/question/14130938
#SPJ1
Answer:
"Forty Years of Blume"
Explanation:
please mark me brainliest please
Answer:
Despite his anger at the argument, Stepan obeys Natalya's request and fetches Ivan- best describes the "father-daughter relationship" section of The Proposal.
Explanation:
In "The proposal" after the proposal of Ivan and the negative of Natalya to it while she did not know that the proposal was, in fact, a marriage one, she calls him "good for nothing" and when her father tells her that he was in there not to have an argument but to make her a marriage proposal she ask him to go for him really fast, as he does.
Answer:
In "The Rhetorical Situation," Lloyd Bitzer notes that rhetorical constraints are "made up of persons, events, objects, and relations which are part of the [rhetorical] situation because they have the power to constrain decision or action." Sources of constraint include "beliefs, attitudes, documents, facts, tradition, image, interests, motives and the like.
Explanation:
Hope this <em><u>Helped!</u></em> :D
Answer:
franchise
Explanation:
hope it works out for you
