All categories

3 years ago

How to analysis these 2 strategies:

Business

1 answer:

valentinak56 [21]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

2 strategies analysis:

The first strategy is ineffective because with a company, when you fire 2 staffs of your company to reduce the wages pay out, this would not work well. As the result of the number of employees that you fire is just 2, this is a really small number of employees if your company is a medium or big, this won’t give any significant improvement for the company. This will also not help your company reduce the wages of employees much and it also won’t give you more money to use in developing the company. This strategy would satisfy manager of the company because manager will pay less for employees as the result of more money would be putting in developing the business. This strategy would not satisfy employees or saying more detail is it will not satisfy 2 employees that were fired. The 2 junior staff that were fired would have decreased satisfaction as they were kicked out of the company and are forced to find a new one. This strategy won’t affect customers and suppliers.

The second strategy is effective because, when the company move the shop to a less expensive lease, this means that the business will pay less for the shop rent. This strategy will mostly satisfy manager with the short-term because first as the result of paying less for the location that the shop is located. But then, after some time if the location is not as popular as the old one, manager would be decrease in satisfaction. This strategy may satisfy employees because for some employees, that would be an increase in satisfaction but for some others, that would be decrease in satisfaction as the result that the company would move to a new place and some employees would have to move further to go to work but some would have to move less to work. Customers would be either increase or decrease in satisfaction as the new location might be nearer for some customers but in the other hand, some customers would be farther from the shop and lead to a decrease in satisfaction. Suppliers would be the same, they would be either decrease or increase satisfaction, they would increase if the shop is nearer to them, but they would decrease if the shop is farer to them than the old one. This strategy will not satisfy the landlord of the old location because the company not hiring it anymore and lead to a decrease in the money get from that.

Recommendation:

The strategy that will satisfy the stakeholders the most is move the shop to the location with less expensive lease. This is because when the company pay less for the rent fee, they will get more money to put on business in order to develop the company. The other reason is the second strategy is more effective than the first strategy is to fire 2 staffs of the company.

Hope this help you lol :3

You might be interested in

Olympia Marketing has instituted new policies around misappropriation of assets, conflicts of interests, and kickbacks. Also wit

777dan777 [17]

Answer:

b) policies and procedures manual.

Explanation:

A company's policies and procedures manual is essential for establishing norms and rules that will guide the company's operation.

Through corporate policies, it is possible to determine actions, conducts, practices and values that the company adopts in order to achieve its objectives and goals, and demonstrate what are its fundamental values that give this organization its own identity and the foundations that will make it different from other companies in the competitive market.

8 0

3 years ago

A Consumer Expenditure Survey in the city of Firestorm shows that people buy only firecrackers and bandages. A Consumer Expendit

azamat

Solution :

Base year : 2019

Expenditure on crackers : $44

Expenditure on bandages : $12

Price of a firecracker : $1

Price of bandages : $3 per pack

Number of crackers bought = $\frac{44}{1}$

= 44

Number of bandages bought = $\frac{12}{3}$

= 4

Total expenditure in 2019 = $44 + $12

= $56

Year 2020

Price of a firecracker = $6

Price of a bandage = $3

Expenditure on the crackers = $ 6 x 44

= $ 264

Expenditure on the bandages = $ 3 x 4

= $ 12

Total expenditure in 2020 = $ 264 + $ 12

= $ 276

CPI in the year 2020 (base year 2019) = $\frac{276}{56}\times 100$

= 492.8

Inflation in 2020 (2019 base year = 100) = $\frac{492.8-100}{100 \times 100}$

= 0.039

= 3.9%

So, CPI = 492.8

Inflation rate = 3.9%

7 0

3 years ago

Consider an investment that pays off $700 or $1,400 per $1,000 invested with equal probability. Suppose you have $1,000 but are

svp [43]

Answer:

a) If you borrow $1,000, the EV is $1,100 and the standard deviation is $990.

b) If you borrow $2,000, the EV is $1,150 and the standard deviation is $1,485.

Explanation:

The expected value is the average return of the investment.

In this case there are only 2 chances: Low ($700 per $1,000) and High ($1,400 per $1,000). Both have 50% chances of happening.

So the expected value is:

$EV = 0.5 * (700) + 0.5*(1400) = 1050.$

The standard deviation can be calculated as

$s=\sqrt{(700-1050)^{2} +(1400-1050)^{2} }=\sqrt{122500+122500} =495$

Case 1: If you borrow $1,000, invest, and then return the $1,000

Low return: 2000*(700/1000)-1000 = 2000*0.7-1000 = 400

High return: 2000*(1400/1000)-1000 = 2000*1.4-1000 = 1800

So the expected value is:

$EV = 0.5 * (400) + 0.5*(1800) = 1100.$

The standard deviation can be calculated as

$s=\sqrt{(400-1100)^{2} +(1800-1100)^{2} } = 990$

Case 1: If you borrow $2,000, invest, and then return the $2,000

Low return: 3000*(700/1000)-2000 = 3000*0.7-2000 = 100

High return: 3000*(1400/1000)-2000 = 3000*1.4-2000 = 2,200

So the expected value is:

$EV = 0.5 * (100) + 0.5*(2200) = 1150.$

The standard deviation can be calculated as

$s=\sqrt{(100-1150)^{2} +(2200-1150)^{2} } = 1,485$

4 0

4 years ago

Lakeside Inc. manufactures four lines of remote control boats and uses activity-based costing to calculate product cost. Activit

Ivanshal [37]

Answer:

$141,373

Explanation:

As provided the details of cost activity:

Rate per activity is as follows:

Machining = $320,000/12,500 hours = $25.60 per hour

Luxury boat = 4,450 hours = $25.60 $\times$ 4,450 = $113,920

Setup = $69,000/350 batches = $197.143 per batch

Luxury boat = $197.143 $\times$ 65 = $12,814.295

Quality control = $89,000/760 = $117.11

Luxury boat = $117.11 $\times$ 125 = $14,638.75

Total Luxury Boat Overheads = $113,920 + $12,814.295 + $14,638.75

= $141,373

7 0

3 years ago

A times-interest-earned ratio of 3.5 indicates that the firm pays 3.5 times its earnings in interest expense. has interest expen

Anarel [89]

Answer:

has EBIT equal to 3.5 times its interest expense.

Explanation:

The times-interest-earned represent how much pressure the interest expense represent for the firm.

the interest expense affect taxes so we use the earning before taxes and, of course, before interest as well.

Therefore we compare EBIT against interest expense

$\frac{EBIT}{interest \: \: \: expense}$

A lower than 1 meas the company cannot pay their interest

above 1 menas it can pay them.

Then, is up to each creditor how much TIE is required to allow for lending to the firm

5 0

3 years ago