To illustrate that the list that McCandless had made was supported by actions as well as words, as shown in option D.
<h3>What is the effect of this description?</h3>
- It increases the reader's feelings about the characters' intentions.
- It optimizes the understanding of McCandess' image.
- Characterizes the characters indirectly.
When Krakauer describes McCandless's image of himself, he promotes a greater understanding of McCandless's list and shows himself as a character who likes to analyze the actions of others very accurately. It also shows that McCandless is a very proactive character who speaks and acts on his words.
This attitude is efficient to explain the characters and indirectly characterizes them.
Learn more about indirect characterization:
brainly.com/question/12003614
#SPJ1
The use of the pronoun "we" in the final sentence of the excerpt; unites Kennedy with the everyday Americans to whom he is speaking.
<h3>Plural Pronouns</h3>
From the excerpt, it follows that the speech was addressed to the citizens which indicates All Americans.
The last sentence reads thus; In the last 24 hours, we had their answer.
The use of the first person plural pronoun, we indicates that Kennedy was referring to himself and the everyday Americans as used in the context.
Read more on Plural pronouns;
brainly.com/question/928913
A moral dilemma is D, when a person's morals require taking two or more conflicting actions. It's in the name.
Answer:
“contains a miracle ingredient”
Explanation:
