Due to the definition of the central dogma, another way of putting it is that the central dogma follows the flow of information from DNA to protein.
Assuming that you followed the parentage of people and primates, you would sooner or later show up at a common precursor that was neither a cutting edge ape nor a human.
<h3>What makes humans different from other Apes?</h3>
- People have an "S" shapes spine with a more limited straight firm more extensive more bowl-like pelvis.
- While Apes have a "C" formed spine and an introvert restricted pelvis.
- People knees are calculated inwards (valgus point - the point the femur makes at the knee) so the knee sits closer the focal point of gravity.
- The knee joints are bigger.
- Individuals have considerably more mind boggling types of verbal correspondence than some other primate species.
- We are the main creature to make and involve images for the purpose of correspondence.
- We additionally have more changed and complex social associations.
To learn more about humans and apes from the given link
brainly.com/question/9824947
#SPJ4
Answer: Incomplete dominance
Explanation: Incomplete dominance is an aspect of go-between inheritance whereby one allele for an outstanding characteristic is not totally represented over its allele appearing in pairs. This brings about about a third set of noticeable characteristics of an individual occurring from the interaction of its genotype with the environment in which the represented physical characteristics like hair type, in this case, is a mixture of the phenotypes of the two alleles.
