<span>No. Initially you
gain riches from the resources found in those territories and yes you extend
your sphere of influence farther and with it your power increases. Still.
Eventually there will come a time when the people of those lands will
rise up and demand independence. Through
peaceful means at first but if not, they will resort to conflict that will be
costly on both sides. Then it will all
boil down to whether you want to hold on or release your hold on that
territory. If you hold on, they will more determined to break free from that
hold. That you gain something through war means you will lose it through war if you don't want to let go.</span>
d. The answer is D because the whiskey rebellion took place from 1791, when a tax over distilled spirits (mainly whiskey in that time in the U.S.) became law, intended to generate revenue for the Revolutionary War debt. It ended three years later, in 1794, when President Washington led a force of over 13,000 men against some 500 violent protesters in Pennsylvania.
This fight, that didn't really take place, led to the formation of two well defined political parties in the United States, the Federalist group stopped being the hegemonic one, making Thomas Jefferson (of the newly formed Republican party) the next president
<span>The Spirit of the Laws, in which he argued for a constitutional government with three separate branches, each of which would have defined abilities to check the powers of the others. Simply so that no one branch had to much power. </span>
Is there any choices? so we can help you
The similarity between the Mughals and the Ottomans and Safavids was that they were all Islamic empires that contributed a lot in the spreading out of the Islam or strengthening it in certain areas.
The differences are that the Mughals originated from the Genghis Khan lineage, thus the Mongols, but also with high influx of Turkic and North Iranian people, while the Ottomans were a mixture of Turkic people and North Iranian people, and the Safavids were predominantly Iranian people.
The Mughals were much more tolerant towards their subjects in both cultural and religious manner, which made the empire relatively stable and made it very prosperous. Also, the Mughals in many ways acted like some of the early Islamic caliphates where they were trying to get more knowledge, focus on science and development, were obsessed with mathematics, and also they made the empire a nice mixture of Indian, Mongol, Turkic, Persian, and Islamic culture, which manifested itself in most of the things in the empire.
The downfall of the Mughals was mostly because of the strength of the British Empire that came in the South Asia region and gradually took over it.
