1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nostrana [21]
3 years ago
9

The fourteenth amendment is a broadly worded and widely utilized law. its original intent, however, was to ______.

History
1 answer:
ludmilkaskok [199]3 years ago
7 0
Establish that former slaves were to be treated legally as United States Citizens
You might be interested in
What makes a republic different from a democracy
-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

Explanation:

The major difference between a democracy and a republic is that a republic is a form of government whereas a democracy is an ideology that helps shape how a government is run. Put another way: a republic is the system of government that allows a country to be democratic!

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements best reflects the power of synthesis in thinking?
aleksklad [387]

Answer:

Option A

Changes in thinking lead to innovative problem-solving.

Explanation:

First of all, we need to understand what synthesis is, and how we can apply it to various thought processes and reasoning.

Synthesis when applied to human reasoning, can be seen as the cognitive ability to put separate items or pieces of information together, to form a new idea.

Applying synthesis to thinking will make it easier to create new solutions to problems. This is because several resources and methods can be combined in various flexible manners to give birth to novel solutions that were non-existent as at when the resources and methods were seen as distinct entities.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the immediate results of the japan/china evasion in 1937?
Leno4ka [110]
I think the answer is that Japan got Manchuria
7 0
3 years ago
The death of prithviraj chauhan led to the end of the Rajput rule in india. Justify this statement
Snowcat [4.5K]

ANSWER: Prithviraj Chauhan was a Rajput Indian king of the Chauhan dynasty who ruled from 1178 to 1192 CE. He was a ruler of the present day states of Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana and Delhi of India. He achieved various military successes against several Hindu kingdoms. He also defeated Muhammad of Ghori who was a ruler of Islamic Ghurid Dynasty. The Muhammad of Ghori reverted back with an attack in 1192 CE with the second battle of Tarain where Prithviraj Chauhan was defeated and it laid the foundation of Islamic conquest in India.

5 0
3 years ago
Select the correct text in the passage.
JulijaS [17]

<u>This portion of the text shows Hobbes supported an absolute ruler:</u>

  • <em>Men are continually in competition for honour and dignity . . . and consequently amongst men there ariseth on that ground, envy, and hatred, and finally war. ... No wonder if there be somewhat else required, besides [contract], to make their agreement constant and lasting; which is a common power to keep them in awe and to direct their actions to the common benefit. </em>
  • <em> The only way to erect such a common power, as may be able to defend them from the invasion of foreigners, and the injuries of one another . . . is to confer all their power and strength upon one man, or upon one assembly of men, that may reduce all their wills, by plurality of voices, unto one will.</em>

Further detail:

Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called Leviathan in 1651.  The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast.  Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society.  In Hobbes' view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast).    Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests.  So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen.  And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The statement that best describes the status of singlehood in early America would be
    10·1 answer
  • How were monks and friars different
    12·1 answer
  • What was aphrodites life like as an adult
    14·1 answer
  • Assess the record of the U.S. Supreme Court on civil liberties during World War I. a. A majority of the justices agreed that the
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a type of business organization in a capitalist system
    8·2 answers
  • Which policy is today’s Republican party most likely to support?
    15·2 answers
  • What clues does this speech provide about why lumumba might have been assassinated?
    10·2 answers
  • I need help with this​
    10·1 answer
  • why does the president make a point of saying “cannot ask that every american remain neutral in thought”?
    7·2 answers
  • How would you describe General Stratemeyer's day? What details help you make that assessment? ​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!