Answer:
cohesive
Explanation:
Group cohesion: The term group cohesion represents the members of a particular group who work together in a positive environment as well as feels positive about their work.
It can cause both, positive consequences or negative consequences that can often lead to alarming results, same as groupthink.
It causes unity in the different members of a group to work together precisely and satisfy the goals, needs, etc.
A groups' cohesion is being impacted by various factors, for example, trust & member similarity.
In the question above, the statement signifies the evidence about the group being cohesive.
1. The desire to make money through the production of goods and services.
2.Uses only free-market principles
3. Provide equality (i think)
4.Protecting freedom of choice
The Magna Carta affected the development of a national identity in England because it was what limited the king and the pope's powers. One example is that the king had to obey the laws of the people so that he could not become too powerful. This was all because there was disagreement when it came to the powers over the Church.
Answer:
Mourning
Explanation:
Mourning is grief that an individual has inside but express it outside. It can be described as the grief gone to the public or we can say that the grief is expressed outwardly. In this term, no one is right but only can mourn. To express the feeling, crying, art, and music is the way to pay some deeds to a dead person. Spacial anniversary dates for a dead person are some examples of mourning.
Thus here in the above statement Mr. Bergman's wife dead, his family, friends, colleagues wore a black dress, attend the funeral and participated in the burial services. Mr. Bergman covered all things with black clothes because of their tradition and show mourning to the dead person.
Answer:
Conflict Perspective
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question the sociological theory that best explains this problem would be the Conflict Perspective theory. This theory basically states that conflict directly influences the distribution of power which in term affects the direction and degree in which social change occurs. Such as this scenario states that wealthier communities receive way better education than poorer communities.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.