Answer:
A. Set above equilibrium price
Explanation:
A price ceiling is a mandatory maximum price that a seller is allowed to charge. Generally, a government may impose this in order to protect consumers, especially with regards to the purchase of essential goods.
If the price ceiling was set below the equilibrium price (option c) or if the equilibrium price is above the price ceiling (option b), it will immediately cause a shortage (option d) since the quantity demanded would be higher than the quantity supplied when the price falls. This is because people will be willing to purchase more since it is cheaper but suppliers will be willing to produce less due to lower profits. Hence, options b, c and d are eliminated.
Option A is correct because... (please refer attached diagram):
When the price ceiling is above the equilibrium price, suppliers are willing to supply more since they can make higher profits but consumers will reduce purchasing since it is expensive. However, it does not cause any immediate effect because it takes time for suppliers to be able to produce more and cannot be done immediately unless anticipated in advance. In the long run however, quantity demanded will fall from equilibrium quantity to D1 and quantity supplied will rise from equilibrium quantity to S1. Hence, causing a surplus between D1 - S1 in the long run.
Answer:
c. is violating both principles of moral reasoning
Explanation:
The argument is deductive invalid as beased on their first sentence that hte government is too big it should accept proportional cuts in all areas of the government including, medicare.
Also, as it being inconsistent as one sentence is in conflit with the other. spending in welfare will make the gervernment weight in the economy to increase or stay the same but, this person claims it needs to decrease.
Answer: Offering recipients of unemployment insurance benefits a cash bonus if they find a new job within a specified number of weeks
Explanation:
The type of unemployment is not given but the above option is the only one that can reduce unemployment out of the options given.
People who recently lost their jobs and are on Unemployment insurance might find that their motivation to look for a job is not as strong as it should be because they are still receiving a paycheck at the end of the month. It will therefore most likely take them longer to find a job than necessary because they simply aren't looking hard enough.
If the Government stepped in and offered them a cash incentive to find a job quicker, this can have the effect of reducing unemployment by giving those people who were just mentioned renewed motivation to look for employment rather than just remain on Unemployment insurance.
As the president of the company, at a time when the prices are said to be rising, what is would do is to choose the Weighted average cost.
<h3>Why I would have to choose the Weighted average cost</h3>
This due to the fact that it is going to be more satisfactory to have the lower Bonus bill.
The year end bonus is an amount that is calculated from all of the net income from the year.
A lower net income is only going going to help to bring about a smaller bonus bill.
At a time when the prices are falling, the FIFO is what would be the best choice. It gives a smaller ending cost of inventory since the ending prices are going to be at their lowest.
Read more on FIFO here: brainly.com/question/12883706
B. in a free market economy, prices and wages result from natural forces
since government will not take any involvement in the economy, prices and wages will be determined by the power of supply and demand
hope this helps
