The answer is Because the quote presents an official statement apexvs
you can use resources to figure it out I use Plato to and it can be vague so it took digging to find the answer
Internet: Websites should be from credible web addresses ending in .edu (an educational institution), .gov (government agency), or .org (non-profit). Any web pages that end in .com (commercial) or .net (networks) should be reviewed with caution.
Books, newspapers, and magazines: Examine the author’s qualifications. He or she should be educated in the field of nutrition/dietetics, and preferably hold a degree from an accredited university (RD, DTR, LD, or MD). These individuals should also belong to a credible nutrition organization.
Television: Make sure that the findings are well researched and repeatable; one study doesn’t make a finding absolute. Be critical and look for follow up studies.
For all media sources: Make sure the information is referenced with cited sources. Seek out multiple perspectives regarding nutrition advice, and ask a nutrition expert about the source of the findings. Ensure that the information is current and informing, not attempting to advertise or sell a product.
A resource will always have value as long as people are willing to pay for it. This happens because the resource is sought after which means people see worth in this resources. One example of this are precious minerals which have no apparent reason why anyone would consider them expensive other than the fact that peopl are willing to pay for them.
Answer: C & D
Explanation: In the context above, there is no scientific correlation or relationship between ice cream and level of temper. The observed association may be either due to mere coincidence, that is, moment whereby reduction in temper of the subject or participant is witnessed aligns with the the time at which ice-cream is consumed. Coincidental relationships have no scientific relationship and are not fixed, as they usually occur rather naturally in varying circumstances.
The observed correlation might also be due to a confounding or third variable which isn't part of our data but impacting our data, hence, resulting in the observed relationship.
