I am not sure this is a question, it is a statement.
Each state would have two delegates in the Senate, while representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. Finally, the delegates agreed to the "Great Compromise," also known as the Connecticut Compromise.
Their so-called Great Compromise (also known as the Connecticut Compromise after its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) established a dual system of congressional representation. Each state would be assigned a number of seats in the House of Representatives based on its population.
The Great Compromise of 1787 gave larger states population-based representation in the lower house, while smaller states gained equal representation in the upper house.
To know more about Great Compromise of 1787 here
brainly.com/question/8242538
#SPJ4
Answer:
The main reason for the rise of dictators in Europe and Asia during the 1930s was that dictators promised economic recovery and order - c. Europe and parts of Asia were in bad economic shape from the World War I stil after that time. Dictators then arose with promises of great recovery and whatnot.
Explanation:
i used somthing called the internet
I'm pretty sure that they opened the first Silk Road
Answer:(B)that the city air became increasingly acidic the closer one came to town
Explanation
(A)The comparatives used in A are 'the closer ... the more. The correct way of writing this would be the more one came ... the more the city air became...'
Another <u><em>mistake in A is redundancy - 'more' and 'increasingly'.
</em></u>
(B)that the city air became increasingly acidic the closer one came to town
No redundancy. Conveys the meaning well.
(C)that coming closer to town, the city air became increasingly acidic.(example of dangling modifier)
(D)that the more the city air became increasingly acidic, the closer one was to town.(It is the example of inverse cause-effect.)
(E)the city air becoming increasingly acidic as one would come closer to town( use of <u>would come i</u>s wrong here)
