Answer:
Incremental income as scrap=$66,500
Incremental income when re-worked= $81,700
Explanation:
Unit contribution from selling as scrap is the equal to the scrap value = 3.50
Unit contribution when reworked and sold as scrap =Selling price - cost of re-work= $8.90-4.60= $4.3
Incremental income as scrap = $3.50×19,000= $66,500
Incremental income when re-worked= $4.3 × 19,000 = $81,700
Incremental income as scrap=$66,500
Incremental income when re-worked= $81,700
The above answer is definitely correct in its details. I'd just like to emphasize a couple of important ideas about Hoover's response.
<span>He tried to do more to fix the economy than any president had ever done before. The government had been very hands-off up to that point.He believed the government should not go in debt no matter what. This limited what he was willing to do. Please note that economists back then agreed with this idea so it's not like Hoover was just being mean. In fact, FDR believed the same thing and it's often said that he undermined the New Deal by trying to balance the budget too soon.</span>
So, overall what I want to point out is that Hoover did more than anyone else, and he did what most economists of the time would have said was the right thing to do. But it didn't work and so he's seen as one of the worst presidents ever, which seems a bit unfair.
Answer:1. Make provision for warranty claims.
2. Disclosure of contingent liability
3. No cost should be recorded.
Explanation:
Warranty is an assurance made by firms to make good any agreed loss that is incurred by the customers in usage of goods and services whiting the period of the warranty. Since an estimation can be made based on firms history of sales a provision has to be made for possible warranty.
Since it's only probably that a loss will be Incurred by the firm by going into the contract and the financial statement has not been issue the firm should made a contingent liability disclosure in the report.
The self insurance is not a contract with a third party, in this vein no cost will be accrued until the loss is actually suffered.
Answer:
D) visibly punish unethical acts
Explanation:
Ethics is the act of knowing what ia right and doing same. That is a good ethical act.
The ethical culture practised by Pam's company is to visibly punish unethical acts. This entails punishing any unethical act appropriately before others to see it.
This approach is really good because it will make others to sit up bearing in mind that they will get same punishment without hesitation if they err.
Pam's organization firing the three managers caught using the company's resources to fund their personal lifestyle pointed towards applying visible punishment for unethical acts.
C) Studied
nonobservance
<span>
A face-saving technique in which all parties
involved in an embarrassing situation ignore it and continue their conversation
or interaction as though the embarrassing situation never happened is referred
to as studied nonobservance. In this case, studied nonobservance is the act of
diminishing or undermining a set of faulty, distressing or embarrassing behaviors
or actions. Includes the flaws, lack of awareness and defects are ceased to
keep the person or individual “on the move” as not to ruin the ego or the self. </span>
