Answer: True
Explanation:
Inflation rate actual measures an increase in the consumer price index (CPI) which is based on average prices of various goods.
The goods which are considered under inflation are based on whether they fall under the prevalent consumption basket in that country.
The index therefore has various goods based on what goods that country consumes the most some goods are responsible for price increase whilst some for price decrease depending on how heavy does each good weigh on the overall consumption basket of that country.
A price index refers to an average price of particular good or services in a particular region at a certain period.
Answer: Purposive
Explanation:
Purposive incentive is the advantage and benefits that a person gains where he/she is indulged in any act ,task or cause with dedication and passion. This additional well-being is provides satisfaction along with the performed work.
It increases the participation of people in any act or task because of the enthusiasm which indicates the effort of people through the benefit.
Explanation:
<em><u>Yes, they do. It's like anywhere else. Nepal has a conservative society, so most people, particularly the older generation are reserved. They don't celebrate occasions like birthdays and anniversaries. Some may organize a puja for good health and safety. However, during the last few decades, the trend of modernization has influenced Nepal too. Most of the outgoing people follow Western trends like those events, celebrating the English New Year and other festivities.</u></em>
The answer is: The cognitive-mediational theory suggests that our emotions are determined by our appraisal of the stimulus while the facial feedback hypothesis does not.
To put it simply, The cognitive-meditational theory infers that the facial expression that we made could not influence the emotion that we felt.
The facial feedback hypothesis, on the other hand, believes that the expression that we made throughout the day could affect our emotions. (if we force ourself to smile throughout the day we will feel happier and handle our stress better)
In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
