Answer: The Supreme Court can declare executive acts unconstitutional.
Explanation:
The Court can declare acts of Congress unconstitutional but this answer does not apply here.
The Court cannot grant pardons.
The Court cannot appoint federal judges. the president does that and the senate confirms.
Life-span perspective would address her concerns.
B. life-span
<u>Explanation:</u>
A life-span point of view is characterized as human advancement dictated by numerous perspectives and structures. By perspectives, we are discussing the entirety of the messes that go with life, from school, financial status, hereditary qualities, and everything else.
Life expectancy improvement includes the investigation of organic, psychological, and psychosocial changes and constancies that happen all through the whole course of life. There are six key parts to the life expectancy viewpoint, including long-lasting advancement, multidimensionality, multi directionality, versatility, multidisciplinary, and logic.
Answer:
B. extortion.
Explanation:
In the context of law, extortion is defined as a criminal offence where an offender/criminal obtains something, particularly money or property, through force or violent threats.
If we look into the above scenario, the two criminals have committed a series of offences, however, they did not force nor threat the client to invest his money into their scheme. Therefore, they cannot be charged with extortion by the court.
Instead they would be charged with criminal conspiracy for scheming a fraud, money laundering for transfering the money into their family business to conceal income and deceit for deceiving the man with lies.
You could write a paragraph on the invention of toilet paper or the invention of electricity or the invention of the phone. Before the invention of toilet paper, people had to use... well anything from newspapers to magazines. Before electricity, people had to work during daylight hours (it was more confining of time). before the invention of the phone, messages had to be delivered in person or by letters.
here are some ideas to get you started. good luck!!
Answer:
The correct answer is: neither productively nor allocatively efficient.
Explanation:
A non-discriminating pure monopoly is considered to be neither productively nor allocatively efficient. Such a monopoly faces a downward-sloping demand curve. It is a price maker and fixes price and output at the point where marginal revenue and marginal cost are equal and the price exceeds the marginal cost.
It does not produce at the socially optimal level of output. The resources are thus not efficiently allocated. The production can be increased by the more efficient allocation of resources.