Answer:
22.85
Explanation:
Present value (PV): $500,000
Rate: 6.5% per annual
Payment (PMT) : $40,000 per year
We can use excel to calculate the maximum number of whole payments that can be withdrawn before the account is exhausted
=NPER(rate, PMT, -PV,,1) = NPER (6.5%,40000,-500000,,1) = 22.85
Answer:
- True
- False
- True
- True
Explanation:
When an economy has a strong balance sheet and a declining budget deficit, it means that there is less need to borrow from the market which would keep rates lower.
When the economy is weakening, the Fed will try to stimulate it by engaging in actions that weaken short term interest rates so that people and businesses can borrow at lower cost and invest or buy goods and services.
When investors are worried about the riskiness of other financial assets, they usually come to safer assets like U.S. Treasury bonds so that they do not lose money and this is what happened in the credit crisis of 2008. More demand for the bonds led to a rise in their price.
Answer:
Value of closing inventory = $ 28,125.00
Explanation:
To value inventory, we multiply the cost per equivalent unit of production (cost per EUP) by the the number of equivalent units(EUP) for each of the cost element.
So the value of the closing inventory, is determined as follows:
Value of inventory = cost per E.U.P × number of E.U.P
Material = $2.50 × 4,500 = 11,250.00
Labour and overhead= $3.75 × 4,500 = 16,875.00
Total amount of work in progress
= 11,250 + 16, 875
= $ 28,125.00
Answer:
It is an example of the shoes leather costs.
Explanation:
Shoe leather cost is the cost which involve the time as well as the efforts which people spend on trying to counter-act the inflation effects like holding less amount of cash and make additional trips to the bank.
In this scenario, Alyssa in order to protect herself from the effect of the inflation, she sends employee to bank for depositing the money into the bank four times a day. Therefore, it is an example of Shoe leather cost
Answer: B) Correct Incorrect
Explanation:
Whilst it was generally believed at some point that raising taxes and Government Spending by the same amount would have no effect, research has disproven this thought.
This is because it was shown that an increase in Government Spending leads to a larger increase in GDP than an increase in taxes reduces it.
This is because when the Government spends money, the Multiplier effect of Government Spending is always 1 more than that of the Taxes therefore raising taxes and spending by the same amounts still increases the Real GDP because Government Spending will create more income than taxes will take.
Necco is right, Packard is wrong.