1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zlopas [31]
3 years ago
9

William Marbury did not win his case against James Madison. What was Chief Justice Marshall's reasoning for why the court could

not produce a writ of mandamus, even though Marshall agreed that Marbury's commission should have been delivered to him? A. Marshall felt protecting the power of the federal government meant that he could not side against the president, and therefore the court was unable to order the president or his staff to act. B. Marshall did not think that Marbury was capable of being a federal justice, and therefore even though the commission should have been delivered, Marshall opted not to press the matter. C. Marshall believed the law that gave the court the power to issue the writ of mandamus was not a constitutional law, and therefore the court did not really have that power. D. Marshall worried that his actions against the Democratic-Republicans would provoke them to impeach him, and therefore, to protect his own position, he did not issue the writ of mandamus.
History
1 answer:
Mice21 [21]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is: C. Marshall believed the law that gave the court the power to issue the writ of mandamus was not a constitutional law, and therefore the court did not really have that power.

You might be interested in
Pls help !!!<br> which of the following best describes the second law passed under the morrill act?
Katen [24]
Southern schools had to prove race was not considered during the school's admissions process.
8 0
3 years ago
How did americans respond to the problems of the 1980s?
garik1379 [7]
You might be able to get some answers from this www.history.com/topics/1980s
The answer I got is many Americans embraced a new conservatism in social, economic, and political life during the 1980's. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why there cannot be a history without sources short answer.
Luden [163]

Answer:

Because without sources, we wouldn't have any proof of evidence that the history being said was true or not. With having proof, we are able to confirm the events have actually taken place.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What impression of Napoleon does each of these sources give you?
oksano4ka [1.4K]
He was delighted and awestruck.
8 0
3 years ago
Que pasaría si el tapir 590 despierta el mangekyou sharingan y empieza a pelear con la paisana jacinta hokage? Porque Chupetin T
OleMash [197]

Answer:

I guess there will just be a whole disaster picking a fight with the Jacinta Hokage to be honest

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happened on July 14, 1789?
    15·2 answers
  • What was General MacArthur's role in the Philippines prior to WWII?
    10·2 answers
  • X
    15·2 answers
  • A logical conclusion from this map is that the
    7·1 answer
  • Which is one way that economies in southern and eastern Africa are overcoming economic challenges?
    8·1 answer
  • Which Founding Father is noted for volunteering to serve in the Continental Army without pay?
    5·1 answer
  • which philosopher believed that only philosophers were capable of governing societies? socrates, aristotle, plato, or sophoctes
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the generals step down from power in Argentina in 1982?
    13·1 answer
  • Overall do conditions appear to be improving or getting worse? What Important qualifications must be made to any generalizations
    9·2 answers
  • Did Islam spread peacefully or violently? Explain your answer
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!