Answer:it's on the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
3 x 1
3 x 1
10 x 5
10 x 9
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Previous concepts
A hypothesis is defined as "a speculation or theory based on insufficient evidence that lends itself to further testing and experimentation. With further testing, a hypothesis can usually be proven true or false".
The null hypothesis is defined as "a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the researcher is trying to disprove".
The alternative hypothesis is "just the inverse, or opposite, of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that researcher is trying to prove".
2) Solution to the problem
On this case we want to test is
and the system of hypothesi on this case are:
Null Hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis:
On this case is our decision is FAILS to reject the null hypothesis then we can conclude that we don't have enough evidence to support the claim at the significance level provided. So the correct conclusion would be:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.
-12x = -48
-12x/-12 = -48/-12
x = 4
hope this helps
3. 1*2* 1/3= 2/3 yd
4. 1/4 * 1/8 *2= 1/16in
6. 12 *4= 48ft
the numbers on the sides are the length, width and height. you multiply them all together to find the volume
Answer:
(x + 1)(5x - 3)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
5x² + 2x - 3
Consider the factors of the product of the coefficient of the x² term and the constant term which sum to give the coefficient of the x- term, that is
product = 5 × - 3 = - 15 and sum = + 2
The factors are + 5 and - 3
Use these factors to split the x- term
5x² + 5x - 3x - 3 ( factor the first/second and third/fourth terms )
= 5x(x + 1) - 3(x + 1) ← factor out (x + 1) from each term
= (x + 1)(5x - 3) ← in factored form