The correct answer is answer C ("The article will be biased because the historian is using only one source about the ruler").
If a historian only took this one scroll to write a biography on its subject (the ruler), it would most likely be extremely misleading and inaccurate. There's no way of getting closer to the truth of any subject without contrasting a variety of opinions from different sources. What if people working for this ruler wrote it in a way that made him look good? What if it was written under pressure? What if it was a complete lie? These and many other questions should come to mind as possible ways in which relying on one source might compromise historical facts.
Hope this helps!
Douglas MacArthur was the commander
Answer:World War II played only a modest role in the recovery of the U.S. economy. ... This expansionary fiscal and monetary policy, together with widespread conscription beginning in 1942, quickly returned the economy to its trend path and reduced the unemployment rate to below its pre-Depression level.
Answer:
Not really
Explanation:
1) I am a Christian meaning I am not religious I am in a relationship with Jesus who is closer and dearer than a brother.
2) Science rather proves my "religion"
3) If you say that all humans come from chimps where did chimps come from?
4) I am not against science
5) Science proves EVERYTHING I believe
6) And for the things that we do not know or can't see " faith. is the evidence of the unseen"
7) We do not see the whole universe but we believe it is there. This is faith
8) Religous believers are Buddhists etc..
9) This is why many Christians, Jews, and Messianic Jews support science
10) Some things said in science do not make sense. Big Bang Theory: where did the first star come from.
11) If God decided to lift a finger Everything would fall apart
12) You can continue living as you want but I know my God is in control and has all power.
Thank you
I can only answer for you the last one issue distinct
hope was right
