1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
antoniya [11.8K]
3 years ago
13

A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be un-obtrusive, taking second place to

the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use. Which one of the statements below follows logically from the statements in the passage?
A) Un-obtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.
B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not un-obtrusive.
C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.
D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.
E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for public use.
Social Studies
2 answers:
Aloiza [94]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.

Montano1993 [528]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A) Un-obtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Can someone help me please
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

It's usually a dictatorship

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. Which battle is known for the Texans fighting heroically to the last man but
son4ous [18]
Battle of San jacinto
7 0
3 years ago
Not communicating can still send a message<br><br> True<br> False
erastovalidia [21]

Answer:

Faulse

Explanation:

because I want it to be

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was colonization good ? why or why not
Shalnov [3]

Answer:

it was bad

Explanation:

it was taking over their land, invading it.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use the map to identify the relative location of a city.
Kipish [7]

north is the answer

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When Antoinette shares her worksheet with other colleagues, she wants to ensure that everyone knows why certain cells are highli
    14·1 answer
  • ALRIGHT PEOPLE! PUT THAT BRAIN TO WORK AND GIVE ME SOMETHING JUICY! I GOT 50pts ON THE LINE and I need an answer BEFORE Feb 21 a
    14·2 answers
  • Made artificially by chemical synthesis. (a.)synthetic (b.)natural (c.)man
    11·2 answers
  • The actual Declaration of Independence is located where today?
    8·2 answers
  • The peoples of the rainforest kingdoms of Ile-Ife and Benin were not Muslim. They practiced religions with
    5·1 answer
  • In Harriet’s country, the ten provincial states that make up the nation hold the majority of power, with a small central governm
    5·1 answer
  • What are differences between han fei tzu and confucius
    11·1 answer
  • Help please!!! Read the text below, and state one way that the Indian Removal Act of 1830 would affect many Native American Indi
    15·1 answer
  • Compare “pluralism” and “amalgamation.”
    9·1 answer
  • A premature beat that originates in the atria in an area other than the sinus node followed by a normal ventricular response is
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!