1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arlecino [84]
3 years ago
12

Read the passage from "By the Waters of Babylon.”

English
2 answers:
oksian1 [2.3K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. “The Forest People could have killed me without fight.”

Explanation:

Since the person is acceptable with death, I feel like he wouldn't care if the forest people killed him so A. is your answer.

kherson [118]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The textual evidence that best supports the analysis that the setting develops the author's acceptance of death is A. "The Forest People could have killed me without fight."

Explanation:

"By the Waters of Babylon" is a short story by Stephen Vincent Benét. The main character, John, is a priest and a priest's son who lives in a post-apocalyptic world where metal is believed to be evil. After having a revelation, John decides to travel to a forbidden place, a place where it is believed by himself and his people that gods used to live.

On his way, John accepts death as a consequence of his decision. He's well aware of the dangers on the way, such as the Forest People. He knows there is nothing that can be done to prevent his being killed in case they attack, as the textual evidence proves: "The Forest People could have killed me without fight."

You might be interested in
Why did Rome form an alliance with Egypt?
Ainat [17]
Rome formed and alliance to get dat dub
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
6. Zaroff also says, "Instinct is no match for reason." Again, explain his
Stells [14]

Let's begin by directly answering the question. Please, keep in mind this question is asking for a personal opinion. You can use this answer as a template in case you disagree with the opinion expressed:

Yes, I believe Zaroff is right when he says, "Instinct is no match for reason." It was our ability to reason that led us to humans to survive and thrive in extreme environments all over the world. It was reason that allowed us to learn from the past and to develop intellectually. That does not mean reason cannot be used for the bad. We do, in fact, use it to destroy, be it with pesticides or with an atomic bomb, for instance. But still, the amazing scientific and technological advances we see in the modern world - take vaccines, smartphones, or 3D printers as an example - are proof of how reason helped us prevail, evolve, and survive.

The character mentioned in the question is general Zaroff, from the short story "The Most Dangerous Game" by American author Richard Connell (1893-1949). Zaroff is a Russian general who lives secluded in an island. His hobby is hunting, and he has grown quite proficient in it. So much so that he no longer sees animals as enough of a challenge. Zaroff now hunts men, who, because of their ability to reason, are more difficult preys. As a matter of fact, the main conflict in the story begins when Zaroff decides to hunt the main character, Rainsford.

In conclusion, <u>the general values humans' ability to reason, but uses it as an excuse to make them his prey</u>. Although his argument that reason is better than instinct is not necessarily wrong, his actions are immoral and indefensible.

Learn more about Zaroff here:

brainly.com/question/6714590?referrer=searchResults

5 0
2 years ago
The spread of the influenza virus was mainly airborne, one person exhaling, another inhaling. - TRUE OR FALSE?
Vlada [557]
True because you can get it when you sneeze, cough or touch anything that has been touched by other people when they were sick
8 0
3 years ago
The type of cover letter written to inquire about possible job openings:
Tasya [4]
Formation of an application letter
8 0
2 years ago
Imagery cannot be used as a rhetorical device? true or false
mash [69]

Answer: True

Explanation: being that a rhetorical device is used to persuade or convince the reader therefore this will help with that.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Was there a true resolution by the end of the play? What is Hamlet’s attitude in the final scene? Has he resolved the conflict b
    15·1 answer
  • You are asked to write a paper on killer bees. What step should you take to make sure your paper is accurate?
    14·1 answer
  • Which one of the following sentences is not a fused sentence or a comma splice? I wanted pancakes for breakfast she wanted eggs.
    15·1 answer
  • PLS HELP! I WILL GIVE BRAINBLIEST! THIS IS DUE TODAY!
    13·2 answers
  • What is your impression of Boxer’s attitude? Predict what you believe will happen to Boxer and how it will affect the animals an
    5·1 answer
  • HEY CAN ANYONE WRITE TODAY'S CNN10 SUMMARY!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Please help me I need to pass my English test badly :(
    12·1 answer
  • Read the following paragraph. How does sentence 3 develop the main idea of the paragraph? (5 points)
    15·2 answers
  • How does this passage contribute to the purpose of
    10·1 answer
  • Help, please the question and thank you
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!