Answer:
Bellisima's opportunity cost:
Production of rye per million hours of labor = 24 / 12 = 2 pairs of jeans
Production of jeans per million hours of labor = 12 / 24 = 0.5 bushels of rye
Dolorium's opportunity cost:
Production of rye per million hours of labor = 32 / 8 = 4 pairs of jeans
Production of jeans per million hours of labor = 8 / 32 = 0.25 bushels of rye
Dolorium has a comparative advantage in the production of jeans while Bellisima has a comparative advantage in the production of rye.
If both countries specialize:
Bellisima will produce 48 million bushels of rye.
Dolorium will produce 128 million pairs of jeans.
Total production of rye has increased by 12 million bushels.
Total production of jeans has increased by 24 million pairs.
Answer:
NPV = (53,222.44)
Explanation:
Net fixed asset 345,000
Working capital
160,000 inventory + 35,000 Ar = 195,000
short term deb (110,000)
net working capital 85,000
Total investment 430,000
salvage value 345,00 x 25% = 86,250
release of the working capital 85,000
Cash flow at end of project 171,250
annual cash flow
sales 550,000
cost (430,000)
depreciation 69,000
EBT 51,000
tax expense 35%
(17,850)
net income 33,150
+ dep 69,000
cash flow 102,150
Now we calculate the present value of the net cash flow and the present alue fothe end of the project
C 102150
time 4
rate 0.15
PV $291,636.04
Principla (sum of salvage and released Working capital 171,250.00
time 5.00
rate 0.15
PV 85,141.52
NPV = 291,636.04 + 85,141.52 - 430,000 = (53,222.44)
If the severity of risk is low and the frequency of the risk event occurring is high thanwe should Avoid the risk.
High Frequency/ High Severity- Risks are almost certain to occur and when they occur impact will be very high. In such a case it is best to use Avoidance as a risk management technique. If avoidance is not possible then prevention and insurance techniques can be considered. High frequency/ Low severity- This more serious risk and occurrence is high but the impact is low. Examples of such risks include workers’ injuries and shoplifting. A common way to manage this type of risk is through Prevention.
Low frequency/ High severity- The impact of these kinds of risks is very high and can bankrupt a business. Insurance is the best technique to manage these risks that have low loss frequency and high loss severity. Low frequency/ Low severity- Retaining and self-insuring the risk. Risk occurrence is low and impact is also very low. In most cases, the costs of managing them outweigh the cost of retaining them.
Learn more about risk frequency here:- brainly.com/question/254161
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. Considered sunk costs, not relevant in further decision making
Explanation:
the missing options are:
- a. Considered sunk costs, not relevant in further decision making
- b. Considered sunk costs, but still relevant in further decision making
- c. Considered a loss
- d. Considered a profit
After the investment in new technology has been made, it will be considered a sunk cost, because they are no longer relevant or important when considering or evaluating future investments and projects. Sunk costs are expenses that have already been made and incurred, and cannot be recouped.
Answer:
The differences between US GAAP and IFRS pose an extra cost because international corporations must prepare two separate accounting statements. But besides that, other potential risks include paying higher taxes than what the companies should pay int their home countries and the uncertainty generated by changing rules.
Not only do current tax rates affect potential investments, e.g. currently companies in the US pay relatively low corporate taxes (Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017) but these benefits end on 2025. But also different methods for valuating physical assets and R&D costs can represent higher than expected taxes. E.g. depending on a company's needs, it may be beneficial to expense all R&D costs right away, or maybe it would be better to capitalize some of them after technical feasibility is achieved (IFRS).
The main advantage of having uniform rules (e.g. UCC) is that all the companies know exactly what to expect and how to act. Certainty decreases risk, and less risk reduces costs.
Explanation:
In the US, the vast majority of firms use US GAAP as their accounting method, but around the world the IFRS method is used.
Physical asset valuation is the process of determining the value of your physical assets including P, P & E, and also inventories.
- When valuing inventories IFRS uses FIFO, while US GAAP allows FIFO, LIFO or weighted average costing methods. US GAAP also values inventory at lesser of cost or market value, while IFRS values inventory at lesser of cost or net realizable value.
- US GAAP uses the cost method to determine the historic cost of an asset, while IFRS uses basically the same method but does not include all the costs of location of the assets (e.g. cost of removing or clearing a facility).
- US GAAP recognizes non-monetary exchanges while IFRS doesn't.
- IFRS also allows the cost of asset to be revalued, which can result in unrealized gains or losses. The US GAAP only considers historic costs.
- There are also other minor differences regarding depreciation, disposals and impairment rules.
Research and development must be expensed right away under US GAAP, while IFRS basically requires the same, it allows some capitalization of development expenditures if certain criteria is met (technical feasibility is achieved).
