Question

Read the passage below and answer the questions that follow It is Friday evening… I cannot wait to have my friends jump into the car to catch up with Tom’s birthday party. We have barely driven a mile when a police officer greets me with a ticket. Why? I am 16 years old, carrying four teenagers, at night and in absence of an adult. Our plan for some fun just failed, but what succeeded was important legislation to keep us safe. Even though teenagers frequently disagree with adults about rules, there is a universal desire to save life; especially of beloved ones. Everyone knows how irresponsible teen drivers are, so it is logical that they are highly restricted. According to a 2016 study by the Travel Safety Commission, teen drivers are more likely to get into accidents due to inexperience, carrying disruptive teenagers as passengers, and driving at less safe times like during the night. In the current provisions of law, persons aged below 18 years are regarded as minors. This label keeps them from the election ballot box and military uniform, so in equal fairness, it should keep them from putting their lives in danger by driving whomever they want, wherever they want, whenever they want. Failing to support this legislation means potential loss of life of our young drivers are on your hands. Teenagers are still in a phase of growth. Consequently, restricted driving permission and Graduated driving programs are creative ways to encourage exploration behind the wheel with a care for lives. Much like schooling levels, this program charts a learner’s progress in driving while rewarding performance with advanced licensing privileges. If we can save life while accommodating youthful adventure in restricted teenage driving, we thus embrace the solution. Which of the following is an example of credible evidence to support the claim? A. Everyone knows how irresponsible teen drivers are, so it is logical that they are highly restricted. B. According to a 2016 study by the Travel Safety Commission, teen drivers are more likely to get into accidents due to inexperience, carrying disruptive teenagers as passengers, and driving at less safe times like during the night. C. Failing to support this legislation means potential loss of life of our young drivers are on your hands. D. Consequently, restricted driving permission and Graduated driving programs are creative ways to encourage exploration behind the wheel with a care for lives.

Answer 1

I believe the correct answer is: B. According to a 2016 study by the Travel Safety Commission, teen drivers are more likely to get into accidents due to inexperience, carrying disruptive teenagers as passengers, and driving at less safe times like during the night.

The credible evidence to support this claim of this excerpt is the study by Travel Safety Commission (2016). The credible sources are materials based on facts, such as an articles, books, monographs, or research papers which scholarly community evaluated as reliable and relevant for their time. These sources are mostly found in libraries, but some could be found on the Internet.

Answer 2

Q: Which of the following is an example of credible evidence to support the claim?

choices:

A. Everyone knows how irresponsible teen drivers are, so it is logical that they are highly restricted.

B. According to a 2016 study by the Travel Safety Commission, teen drivers are more likely to get into accidents due to inexperience, carrying disruptive teenagers as passengers, and driving at less safe times like during the night.

C. Failing to support this legislation means potential loss of life of our young drivers are on your hands.

D. Consequently, restricted driving permission and Graduated driving programs are creative ways to encourage exploration behind the wheel with a care for lives.

A,C n D do not provide any evidence to support the claim. the only choice left n also the correct ans is B.