The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did attach further context or references.
However, we can comment on the following.
The hyperfocus on crime among athletes is limited to these two sports: football and basketball.
The reason why is that these two sports produce too many "stars" that have too much notoriety for their conduct and behaviors. Some of the athletes that participate in these professional sports got too much attention from the media and the public and are considered famous. This popularity often produces that they lost the ground and act in incongruent ways, many times making the worts decisions that impact their careers by the mistakes they make.
As the public figures they are, their behavior immediately makes the news, and their poor judgment often brings negative consequences to their careers.
Answer:Universal suffrage (also called universal franchise, general suffrage, and common suffrage of the common man) gives the right to vote to all adult citizens, regardless of wealth, income, gender, social status, race, ethnicity, political stance, or any other restriction, subject only to relatively minor exceptions.[1][2] In its original 19th-century usage by reformers in Britain, universal suffrage was understood to mean only universal manhood suffrage; the vote was extended to women later, during the women's suffrage movement.[3][4]
There are variations among countries in terms of specifics of the right to vote; the minimum age is usually between 18 and 25 years (see age of majority) and "the insane, certain classes of convicted criminals, and those punished for certain electoral offenses" sometimes lack the right to vote.[2]
In the first modern democracies, governments restricted the vote to those with property and wealth, which almost always meant a minority of the male population.[5] In some jurisdictions, other restrictions existed, such as requiring voters to practice a given religion.[6] In all modern democracies, the number of people who could vote has increased progressively with time.[7][8] The 19th century saw many movements advocating "universal [male] suffrage", most notably in Europe, Great Britain and North America.[9][7]
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
While the puritans where radical protestants of calvinist inspiration who deemed God to be the center of the universe, the meaning of life, the determinant of people's fate, and whose ultimate desire was to act in God's way, the Enlightenment thinkers were antropocentrics who believed that humans, not God, were at the center of the universe, were rationalists who thought that explanations for reality should be found in science, and not in religion, and whose ultimate desire was to act rationally, and accordingly to personal principle.
This means that the Enlightment marked a transition toward a more flexible approach to life: equally serious as the Puritan way of life because it was also rational, but less rigid because now humans set their own limits, those limits were not set by a divine force anymore.
Answer:
its either christianity or islam sorry
Explanation:
If the President of the United States meets with the Prime Minister of Great Britain to finalize negotiations of a treaty allowing the United States to use British territory to establish a military base, he is performing his role as Commander in Chief.
Among the different power assigned to the President of the United State, he also acts as commander in chief of the armed force. Being Commander in Chief, he can take important military decisions. He can declare war, conclude treaties and make any military-related policies.
#SPJ4