Yep you have done it correctly
The answer is B, there’s no solution.
Answer:
a. (x,y) -> (x,-y)
Step-by-step explanation:
Just by observing the graphs original and transformed shape, you can see that both graphs are in the same negative x-axis. Yet, the original is in the positive y-axis and the transformed is in the negative y-axis.
Given that <span>Kalen wrote 60:20, or 3: 1 on his paper.
The comparison statement that would describe the ratios that he wrote are:
For every 60 parts of a quantity, there is 20 parts of another quantity.
or
</span><span>For every 3 parts of a quantity, there is 1 parts of another quantity.</span>
