This case supported the existence of Jim Crow Laws because their decision was "separate but equal". The Jim Crow Laws were based on "separate but equal". For instance, blacks and whites had the same bathroom, but they had two separate ones.
Hope this helps.
(Please mark this as brainliest if it helped you)
Answer:
britain and the colonies
Explanation:
It is this because the others don't make any sense. It wouldn't be the indians because they had no say in it. It also doesn't mean slaves and slave owners because they didn't revolve around just slave work.
my guess would be imperialism
Answer:
just report them if they didn't answer and they just took your points
Look it up on google answers
hope i helped ;3 <3