1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jonny [76]
4 years ago
12

Consider a model with an interaction between expenditures: voteA 5 b0 1 b1prtystrA 1 b2expendA 1 b3expendB 1 b4expendA#expendB 1

u. What is the partial effect of expendB on voteA, holding prtystrA and expendA fixed? What is the partial effect of expendA on voteA? Is the expected sign for b4 obvious?
Business
1 answer:
andrew11 [14]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

1. What is the partial effect of expendA on voteA?

ΔvoteAΔexpendA=β2+β4expendB→0.0382809+−6.63e−6expendB

2. Is the expected sign for b4 obvious?

Yes because the expendB alone is a negative and expendA is a positive leaving B4 to be a negative number .

You might be interested in
If the price elasticity of demand for a product is unity, a decrease in price will:
Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

increase the quantity demanded but decrease total revenue.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
On February 2, 2016, the Farmer Corporation issued 9,000 shares of no-par stock for $17 per share. Within two hours of the issue
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

D. 189,000 = NA + 189,000 NA - NA = NA 189,000 FA

Explanation:

The accounting equation shows the relationship between the elements of a balance sheet which are assets liabilities and equity. This may be expressed mathematically as

Assets = Liabilities + Equity

While assets include fixed assets, cash, inventories, account receivables etc, liabilities include accounts payable, loans payable, accrued expenses etc.

Equity which represents the amount owed to the owners of the business includes retained earnings (which is the accumulation of the net income/loss over the years less dividends paid) and common shares.

When 9,000 shares of no-par stock issued for $17 per share increases to $21, this means that the additional amount

= ($21 - $17) × 9000

= $36,000

Amount to be collected from the issue

= $21 × 9000

= $189,000

This will result in an increase in cash and an increase in owners equity (the respective debits and credits).

5 0
3 years ago
Colleen sold a house to Ben for $300,000. Before selling the House, Colleen forgot to tell Ben about a leaky faucet in a little-
arlik [135]

Answer: Because Y's failure to notice the leaky faucet means that he did not justifiably rely on X's "misstatement."

Explanation: Ben may be unable to rescind on the basis that, upon the sale of the property, the leaky faucet is as not intentionally hidden from Ben's notice. If during the property inspection, the leaky faucet was noticed by Ben, and Colleen gave a false statement about the faucet in other to conceal the impairment, then Colleen would have been deemed to have made Ben rely on a false statement and thus making a rescind by Ben would have been possible.

4 0
3 years ago
A profit-maximizing firm will not employ an additional unit of a resource if the marginal product of that unit is greater than t
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer:

The Answer is A) True                                    

Explanation:

The marginal cost of production and marginal revenue are economic measures used to determine the amount of output and the price per unit of a product that will maximize profits. A rational company always seeks to optimize its profit, and the relationship between marginal revenue and the marginal cost of production helps to find the point at which this occurs. The point at which marginal revenue equals marginal cost maximizes a company's profit.

Cheers!

4 0
3 years ago
You can buy property today for $3 million and sell it in 5 years for $4 million. (you earn no rental income on the property.)
Luden [163]

a. Rate of interest : 8%

Today’s Price = $3,000,000

Price after 5 years = $4,000,000

Present Value of price after 5 years = $4,000,000 / (1+0.08)^5

= $2,722,333.88

b. The property is not worth investing, since investing in the land is $3,000,000 while it can be sold today as $2,722,333, thus not a profitable investment as it will incur a loss of $277,667 ($3,000,000 - $4,000,000).

c. Present value of rent of 5 Years = $200,000*PVIFA(8%,5)

= $200,000*3.99999

= $798,542.01

d. NET PRESENT VALUE OF INVESTMENT = PRESENT VALUE OF FUTURE CASH FLOWS – INITIAL INVESEMTENT

NET PRESENT VALUE = $2,722,333.88 + $798,542.01 - $3,000,000

NET PRESENT VALUE = $520,874.80

Since the Net Present value is positive, it is worth investing in the land.

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these people will be eligible for a tax deduction?
    13·2 answers
  • Valuing assets at their fair value rather than at their cost is inconsistent with the: periodicity assumption. full disclosure p
    12·1 answer
  • Deere & Company is a global manufacturer and distributor of agricultural, construction, and forestry equipment. The company
    14·1 answer
  • A(n) __________ contract is a contract in which one or both parties has the ability to either withdraw from or enforce the contr
    10·2 answers
  • Which is not a factor that can cause a change in supply?
    11·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
    11·1 answer
  • Femur Co. acquired 70% of the voting common stock of Harbor Corp. on January 1, 2014. During 2014, Harbor had revenues of $2,500
    15·1 answer
  • what types of product categories would the SOLAR aspect allow a manufacturer to change the value curve
    11·1 answer
  • Hey i made this so people could talk to other people dont make an answere
    15·1 answer
  • When the trial balance is prepared and found to be in balance we can conclude that?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!