The answer for your question is the Civil War A)
✅In describing the American identity, Huntington first contests the notion that the country is, as often repeated, "a nation of immigrants".
✅Huntington defines the American Creed as embodying the "principles of liberty, equality, individualism, representative government, and private property".
IamSugarBee
The growth of industries and urban population was the major change, beginning in the late 1790's/ early 1800's using technological improvements and taking advantage of a large pool of immigrants which arises in the United States.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The need of labor in the industries for huge production attracted the attention of the rural people, it was an opportunity for the rural people to settle inside the cities and become urban. Around 1920, nearly the major parts of America was populated with urban communities.
Around the period 1870 and 1920, nearly 25 million immigrants entered the country. They came with an hope to take part in the industry labor and gain enough wages that wouldn't push them to poverty. Places like New York, Cleveland, St.Louis attracted a lot of immigrants as it was a place of opportunities and in fact the immigrants were eager to work.
It was not just an advantage for the rural and immigrants but as well as for the factories and industries, who utilized these people for better use and development of the cities.
Answer:
under foreign rule. native culture and industry were destroyed.
Explanation:
it led to slave trade which them led to social discrimination around the world, it also damaged the cultures and created disunity among the natives finally it stripped countries off their natural resources and left nothing for the natives.
Bryan was the last of the Great Political Orators in some ways. He could speak at great length on any topic, using powerful imagery, often of a religious nature, to audiences raised on such language and imagery.
Unfortunately, the telegraph already was encouraging economy of language, and the radio would make long speeches less useful than shorter ones which reached the point quickly. People in churches no longer spent hours listening to a single sermon, and those who followed the earsteps of Abraham Lincoln learned that eloquence was not a matter of length, but of substance.
The “Cross of Gold” speech which he thought would propel him to the Presidency would not work today.
The only orators today who speak interminably tend to be dictatorial in nature, in love with their own voice, and whose followers dote on every word, no matter how repetitious. Bryan was leagues above that, but someone who seeks his skill will learn why society has passed the skills of the long-sermoned preacher by.
