Answer:
An enlightened despot (also called benevolent despot) is an authoritarian leader who exercises his political power according to the principles of the Enlightenment. Historically they were monarchs using enlightened ideas and principles in order to enhance the central government's power.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
if so... plz mark BRAINLIST
thx!
The middle class had more power, traveling was safe, etc.
Answer:
That they are friends and not enemies. And they must not be enemies
Explanation:
Following the victory of Abraham Lincoln as the President of the United States in 1860. There were widespread worries, most especially among the Southern states.
The worry was based on the fact that Abraham Lincoln was a Republican and he could threaten their hold on slavery use. Starting with South Carolina the first state to declare itself out of the union. South Carolina's actions were followed by another Six States.
This forced Abraham Lincoln to deal with the issue in his first inaugural address. He listed various reasons for the states not to secede.
However, Lincoln’s strongest argument as to why the South should not "that they are friends and not enemies. And they must not be enemies."
This was evident in the last paragraph of the address, where it was stated that "We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection..."
Schism of 1054<span>. </span>Schism of 1054<span>, also called </span>East–West Schism<span>, event that precipitated the final separation </span>between the Eastern<span> Christian </span>churches<span> (led by the patriarch of Constantinople, Michael Cerularius) and the </span>Western Church<span> (led by Pope Leo IX).</span>
At the Yalta Conference in February, 1945, Stalin had agreed to enter the war against Japan three months after Germany was defeated. Victory in Europe was achieved on May 8, 1945. The Soviet Union declared war on Japan on August 8, 1945, and invaded Manchuria with over a million troops to take on the Japanese army there.
As to the dropping of the second atomic bomb, even the dropping of the first could be challenged when factoring in the USSR. An option to dropping atomic bombs was to enlist Soviet troops in a joint invasion of Japan. But the USA wanted to avoid postwar Soviet presence in Japan, and the atomic bombs were seen as a way of ending the war quickly. As to the use of a second bomb at Nagasaki after the first was dropped on Hiroshima, it was because of the Allies' requirement that Japan submit to an unconditional surrender. They did not do so in the immediate aftermath of the Hiroshima bombing, so the second bomb was used. You can consider for yourself whether some other resolution besides "unconditional surrender" was a viable option.
