The reasons for the revolutions are many, but we can point out some as the form of government; Russia was one of the last major European countries where the monarchy was an autocrat, his power not limited by laws or institutions. Another fact was the total inefficient emperor and Tsar of all Russians, Nicholas II.
Also, the development of an "educated middle class", result of the industrial revolution in Russia, provided the social basis for the creation of a liberal political movement demanding political rights and constitutionalism.
Finally, the world war I was the central reason for the revolution and its outcome. Russia was completely unprepared military, industrially and politically. By the end, the empire had lost large and rich portions of land and millions of men. This chaotic scenario made the revolution inevitable. The generalized dissatisfaction forced Tsar Nicholas II to abdicate and created a vacuum of power that led the Soviet party to slowly take control of the Russian administration.
<span>Being obedient to the will of God.</span>
The correct answer is: "A"
John Locke FRS (Wrington, Somerset, August 29, 1632-Essex, October 28, 1704) was an English philosopher and physician, considered one of the most influential thinkers of English empiricism and known as the "Father of Classical Liberalism" . He was one of the first British empiricists. Influenced by the ideas of Francis Bacon, he made an important contribution to the theory of the social contract. His work greatly affected the development of epistemology and political philosophy. His writings influenced Voltaire and Rousseau, thinkers of the French Enlightenment, as well as American revolutionaries. His contributions to classical republicanism and liberal theory are reflected in the Declaration of Independence of the United States and the Bill of Rights of 1689.
According to Locke, the State's main mission is to protect those rights, as well as the individual liberties of citizens. He also argues that the government must be constituted by a king and a parliament. The parliament is where popular sovereignty is expressed and where the laws that both the king and the people must fulfill are made. Anticipating Montesquieu, whom Locke influenced, he describes the separation of the legislative and executive powers. The authority of the State is based on the principles of popular sovereignty and legality. Power is not absolute but must respect human rights.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. The aspect of english government traditions that did not influence leaders in the united states would be the protection from arrest without cause. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
The correct answer is C) An executive order contradicts a bill Congress is debating.
The statement that describes how executive orders can lead to conflict with the legislative branch is "An executive order contradicts a bill Congress is debating."
As part of the system of checks and balances instituted by the founding fathers in the Constitution of the United States, neither branch has more power than the other. However, the leadership and presence of the President of the US, makes him the most important figure of the federal government.
The President is the leader of the nation, the chief diplomat, and the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. He also has the power to veto laws and return them to the US Congress, creates executive orders to change things in the government. And this power has created conflict with the legislative branch in the past.
