<h2>Answer:</h2>
According to me the statement that best explain the difference between Mr. Dussel's and Mr. Frank's viewpoint is
C. Mr. Dussel believes the Dutch are good people, Mr. Frank does not.
Because in this situation they are actually having a different opinion or point of view about Dutch. So, it explain best the difference between their point of view.
Answer:
i just did this 2 days ago ill help you hold on
Explanation:
Talk: if the word "did"(helping verb) is in front of the word it is meaning that someone spoke in the past, but if the helping verb "will" is before the word it means that someone is going to speak in the future (most likely about to start talking)
talk-"ing": the same thing as "talk" EXCEPT "ing" is a suffix which means presently, so "talking" means that someone is currently speaking.
talk-"ed": once again the same thing, however, the suffix "ed" means already DID or in the past.
talk- "en": actually this is sadly not an english word, but the suffix "en" means made of. For example, "golden" means MADE OF gold.
Hope this helped:)
The reasoning that Machiavelli uses in this passage is: Machiavelli uses deductive reasoning by first introducing the conclusion that new rulers must be cruel and then supporting it with evidence.
Deductive reasoning is a form of reasoning where broad generalizations are first made before specific observations are used to corroborate it.
In the passage, we see an example of deductive reasoning because a broad generalization about the cruelty of leaders was first made before examples were used to support it.
Learn more about deductive reasoning here:
brainly.com/question/7284582
