Answer:
a) The number of visits between the patrons who buys the season passes shows higher frequency than those who did not buy season passes, in general. However, the minimum value of 1 visit is present for both cases.
b) The mean visits of the patrons are just PARAMETERS. If you want to test your hypothesis using hypothesis testing, the statistics are the z or t scores comparing the parameters (means).
c) The proportion who would have paid less are those with 2 or fewer visits because they would only just paid $82 instead of $100.
Number of patrons with 2 or fewer visits: 16
Total number of patrons who bought season passes: 30
Proportion who would've paid less = 16/30 = 0.5333
Step-by-step explanation:
I just did it
0+0=0 0+0=0+0
They are all addition, and they are all 0, and since 0 equals nothing, the sum is equivalent to 0!
The answer is 21.
Explanation:
5x3=15
15+6=21
The answer for the following question is A) -b
You subtract the % that the sale is and take it away from 100%. You get 75% then take the original price and divide it by .75
