1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pickupchik [31]
3 years ago
12

One explanation for the economic difficulties experienced in much of Africa today is that many Africa countries have ___________

economic systems
A restricted trade
B free trade
C import- oriented
D export- oriented
History
1 answer:
ra1l [238]3 years ago
6 0

The difficulties experienced in much of Africa today is that many African countries have restricted trade economic systems.

Answer: Option A

<u>Explanation:</u>

Africa is a country which has restricted trade and hence has no significant increase in their economic systems. The little African countries trade only with each other which did not give any perspective increase. Africa needs to have free trade which would lead to a rather faster economic growth.

Free trade would pave a way for Africa to trade with many other countries and lead way towards better enhancement. Free trade will provide an international market of producers and manufacturers to have trade with Africa.Only free trade can lift up the economy of the African countries.

You might be interested in
Please help me on this
photoshop1234 [79]
Try not to anwser all mitosis because that is not ok so try looking at the pictures closey
6 0
3 years ago
How were the Navigation Acts an application of England’s use of mercantilism?
madreJ [45]

Answer:

Dndnnd

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What modern states did 1648 sweden control?
tino4ka555 [31]

The Swedish Empire (Swedish: stormaktstiden, "the era of great power") refers to the Kingdom of Sweden's territorial control of much of the Baltic region during the 17th and early 18th centuries, a time when Sweden was one of the great European powers.[1] The beginning of the Empire is usually taken as the reign of Gustavus Adolphus, who ascended the throne in 1611, and the end as the loss of territories in 1721 following the Great Northern War. In Swedish history, the period is referred to as stormaktstiden, literally meaning "the Great Power era".[1]

After the death of Gustavus Adolphus in 1632, the empire was, over lengthy periods, controlled by part of the high nobility, most prominently the Oxenstierna family, acting as tutors for minor regents. The interests of the high nobility contrasted with the uniformity policy (i.e., the upholding of the traditional equality in status of the Swedish estates favoured by the kings and peasantry). In territories acquired during the periods of de facto noble rule, serfdom was not abolished, and there was also a trend to set up respective estates in Sweden proper. The Great Reduction of 1680 put an end to these efforts of the nobility and required them to return estates once gained from the crown to the king. Serfdom, however, remained in force in the dominions acquired in the Holy Roman Empire and in Swedish Estonia, where a consequent application of the uniformity policy was hindered by the treaties by which they were gained.

After the victories in the Thirty Years' War, the climax of the great power era was reached during the Second Northern War, when their primary adversary Denmark was neutralized by the Treaty of Roskilde in 1658. However, in the further course of this war as well as in the subsequent Scanian War, Sweden was able to maintain her empire only with support of her closest ally, France.[2] Charles XI of Sweden consolidated the empire and ensured a period of peace, before Russia, Saxony and Denmark started a concerted attack on his successor, Charles XII. After initial Swedish victories, Charles secured the empire for some time in the Peace of Travendal (1700) and the Treaty of Altranstädt (1706), before the Battle of Poltava (1709) finally brought the great power era of Sweden to an end.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The concept of separation of powers is a means to what end?
sergiy2304 [10]
The concept of separation of powers is a way to divide power equally among the three government branches while not giving one branch too much power over the others.
7 0
3 years ago
When was jfk assassinated
ElenaW [278]

November 22, 1963


Hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The first cultures in New Mexico ___________________. a. developed a series of ancient roads. b. were hunters and gatherers. c.
    11·2 answers
  • What measures did Herbert Hoover take to deal with the Great Depression?
    13·1 answer
  • Which number on the map shows the approximate location of the end of the Aryan migration?
    12·2 answers
  • The battle of iwo jima was significant because?
    8·1 answer
  • Which period is the predecessor of the modern period? What was it duration in India?​
    13·1 answer
  • Where is the majority of Russia’s population found?
    6·1 answer
  • How were the lives of children in the middle of the 19th century different from previous generations?
    5·1 answer
  • What made the USA military powerful ​
    9·2 answers
  • What does the photograph below indicate about the United States in the 1950’s?
    7·1 answer
  • For whom was the battle of Trenton a victory
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!